ArticleMedicine2020
The efficacy and safety of Chinese herbal compound or combined with western medicine for pediatric adenoidal hypertrophy: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Traditional Chinese medicine for pediatric adenoid hypertrophy: an Umbrella review of methodological, reporting, and evidence quality.Frontiers in allergy · 2026Review
- Efficacy and safety of spleen aminopeptide oral solution for children with allergic rhinitis and adenoid hypertrophy: a randomised trial.Translational pediatrics · 2024Article
- Maximal medical treatment of adenoid hypertrophy: a prospective study of preschool children.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2024Article
- 150th Anniversary of global adenoid investigations: unanswered questions and unsolved problems.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTraditional Chinese medicine (TCM) or combined with western medicine in the treatment of pediatric adenoidal hypertrophy has been widely used in clinical practice, but the overall efficacy and safety is still unclear. This paper aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety analysis of TCM or combined with western medicine for pediatric adenoidal hypertrophy.
methodsPubMed, EMbase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), WanFang, the Chongqing VIP Chinese Science and Technology Periodical Database, and China biomedical literature database (CBM) were searched for randomized controlled trials of TCM or combined with western medicine for pediatric adenoidal hypertrophy from the date of establishment to July 2020, and Baidu Scholar, Google Scholar, International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP), and Chinese Clinical Trials Registry (ChiCTR) were searched for unpublished grey literature. Two researchers independently applied RevMan 5.3 software for data extraction and risk assessment of bias.
resultsThe effectiveness and safety of TCM or combined with western medicine for pediatric adenoidal hypertrophy is evaluated by means of the Adenoid (A) /(Nasopharyngeal (N) ratio, clinical efficacy, integral score of TCM syndromes, clinical single symptom score, disease specific quality of life for children with obstructive sleep apnea 18 items survey (OSA-18), Interleukin 4 (IL-4) and adverse reaction incidence.
conclusionThis study will provide theoretical support for the clinical application of TCM or combined with western medicine for pediatric adenoidal hypertrophy. OSF REGISTRATION NUMBER: DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/J76AG.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.