ArticleMedicine2020
Incidence trend and age-period-cohort analysis of reported hepatitis C among residents aged 30 to 79 in northeastern China, 2008 to 2017.
Article in Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Hepatitis C virus infection in blood donors in Santa Catarina, Brazil, 2010-2020.Transfusion medicine (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
- Trends in Mortality Related to Hepatitis B and C from 1990 to 2019 in the Western Pacific Region.Gut and liver · 2024Article
- Planning, implementing, and evaluating Hepatitis C virus elimination via collaborative community-based care cascade: age-period-cohort model for estimating demand from antecedent anti-HCV survey.Hepatology international · 2024Article
- Hepatitis B and C mortality from 1990 to 2019 in China: a Bayesian age-period-cohort analysis.Annals of translational medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to acquire the epidemic trend of age-standardized reported incidence and to analyze the age effect, period effect, and cohort effect on the reported incidence of hepatitis C in Jilin Province, China.We collected the annual reported incidence data of hepatitis C by gender (2008-2017). Annual percentage change and annual average percentage change were calculated by joinpoint Poisson regression analysis. The age effect, period effect, and cohort effect on the incidence of hepatitis C were estimated by an age-period-cohort model, and the relative risk was determined.Joinpoint regression analysis showed that the age-standardized reported incidence of hepatitis C indicated a declining trend integrally. Among people aged 30 to 44 (youth), the incidence trend declined the fastest, while trends declined the slowest among women and the overall population aged over 66 (elderly people) and men aged 45 to 65 (middle-aged group). The results of the age-period-cohort model showed that the reported incidence increased first and then decreased with age. Throughout the period, the risk of hepatitis C also increased first and then decreased. Compared with the median birth cohort of the same age group, the birth cohort of the patients with the highest incidence of hepatitis C was in the 1930s, followed by the 1940s and 1950s. The birth cohort of the patients with the lowest incidence was in the 1980s, followed by the 1970s and 1960s.Although the overall reported incidence trend of hepatitis C is declining and the risk of the young birth cohort is low, many factors affecting infection and testing with hepatitis C still exist in China. We should focus on high-risk population management and formulate corresponding public health strategies to accelerate the implementation of the global health strategy to eliminate hepatitis C published by the World Health Organization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.