ArticleMedicine2020
Association of long-chain non-coding RNA GAS5 gene polymorphisms with prostate cancer risk and prognosis in Chinese Han population.
Article in Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Importance of long non-coding RNAs in the pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment of prostate cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Review
- Role of Long Non-Coding RNA Polymorphisms in Cancer Chemotherapeutic Response.Journal of personalized medicine · 2021Review
- Long Noncoding RNAFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTo investigate the correlation between growth arrest-specific transcript 5 (GAS5) gene polymorphism and the risk and prognosis of prostate cancer in Chinese Han population.
methodsSanger sequencing was used to analyze genotypes at the rs17359906 and rs1951625 loci of the GAS5 gene in 218 prostate cancer patients and 220 healthy controls. The follow-up period was from August 2016 to August 2019, and the relationships between GAS5 gene polymorphisms at the rs17359906 and rs1951625 loci and the recurrence-free survival rate of prostate cancer patients were analyzed.
resultsGAS5 A-allele carriers at the rs17359906 locus were 3.44 times more likely to develop prostate cancer than G-allele carriers (95% confidence interval (CI): 2.38-4.96, P < .001). Carriers of the GAS5 A allele at the rs1951625 locus had a 1.40-fold higher risk of prostate cancer than carriers of the G allele (95% CI: 1.05-1.86, P = .027). Plasma prostate-specific antigen (PSA), body mass index (BMI), and rs17359906 and rs1951625 loci were independent risk factors for prostate cancer. GAS5 AA genotype and A-allele carriers (GA + AA) at the rs1951625 locus were significantly correlated with Gleason scores ≤7 (P < .05). GAS5 genes rs17359906 G > A and rs1951625 G > A were associated with high plasma PSA levels. The recurrence-free survival rate of patients with prostate cancer with AA genotype at the rs17359906 locus of GAS5 (66.67%) was significantly lower than that of the GA genotype (76.47%), whereas the GG genotype was the highest (91.96%), and the difference was statistically significant (P = .002). The recurrence-free survival rate of patients with prostate cancer with the AA genotype at the rs1951625 locus of GAS5 (75.00%) was significantly lower than that of the GA genotype (81.82%), whereas the GG genotype was the highest (87.76%) with a statistically significant difference (P = .025).
conclusionGAS5 rs17359906 G > A and rs1951625 G > A are significantly associated with an increased risk of prostate cancer and a reduction in three-year relapse-free survival.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.