Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32898945›Full record

ArticleAnimal bioscience2021

Effects of using different roughages in the total mixed ration inoculated with or without coculture of Lactobacillus acidophilus and Bacillus subtilis on in vitro rumen fermentation and microbial population.

Michelle Miguel, Lovelia Mamuad, Sonny Ramos, Min Jung Ku, Chang Dae Jeong, Seon Ho Kim, Yong Il Cho, Sang Suk Lee

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animal bioscience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Kimchi cabbage (Journal of animal science and technology · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Michelle MiguelDepartment of Animal Science and Technology, College of Bio-industry Science, Sunchon National University, Suncheon 57922, Korea.
Lovelia MamuadDepartment of Animal Science and Technology, College of Bio-industry Science, Sunchon National University, Suncheon 57922, Korea.
Sonny RamosDepartment of Animal Science and Technology, College of Bio-industry Science, Sunchon National University, Suncheon 57922, Korea.
Min Jung KuLivestock Research Institute, Jeonnam Agricultural Research and Extension Services, Gangjin 59213, Korea.
Chang Dae JeongDepartment of Animal Science and Technology, College of Bio-industry Science, Sunchon National University, Suncheon 57922, Korea.
Seon Ho KimDepartment of Animal Science and Technology, College of Bio-industry Science, Sunchon National University, Suncheon 57922, Korea.
Yong Il ChoDepartment of Animal Science and Technology, College of Bio-industry Science, Sunchon National University, Suncheon 57922, Korea.
Sang Suk LeeDepartment of Animal Science and Technology, College of Bio-industry Science, Sunchon National University, Suncheon 57922, Korea.
Sunchon National University · KRJeonbuk Agricultural Research & Extension Services · KR

Funding

Sunchon National University
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study aimed to determine the effects of different roughages in total mixed ration (TMR) inoculated with or without coculture of Lactobacillus acidophilus (L. acidophilus) and Bacillus subtilis (B. subtilis) on in vitro rumen fermentation and microbial population.

methodsThree TMRs formulations composed of different forages were used and each TMR was grouped into two treatments: non-fermented TMR and fermented TMR (F-TMR) (inoculated with coculture of L. acidophilus and B. subtilis). After fermentation, the fermentation, chemical and microbial profile of the TMRs were determined. The treatments were used for in vitro rumen fermentation to determine total gas production, pH, ammonianitrogen (NH3-N), and volatile fatty acids (VFA). Microbial populations were determined by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR). All data were analyzed as a 3×2 factorial arrangement design using the MIXED procedure of Statistical Analysis Systems.

resultsChanges in the fermentation (pH, lactate, acetate, propionate, and NH3-N) and chemical composition (moisture, crude protein, crude fiber, and ash) were observed. For in vitro rumen fermentation, lower rumen pH, higher acetate, propionate, and total VFA content were observed in the F-TMR group after 24 h incubation (p<0.05). F-TMR group had higher acetate concentration compared with the non-fermented group. Total VFA was highest (p<0.05) in F-TMR containing combined forage of domestic and imported source (F-CF) and F-TMR containing Italian ryegrass silage and corn silage (F-IRS-CS) than that of TMR diet containing oat, timothy, and alfalfa hay. The microbial population was not affected by the different TMR diets.

conclusionThe use of Italian ryegrass silage and corn silage, as well as the inoculation of coculture of L. acidophilus and B. subtilis, in the TMR caused changes in the pH, lactate and acetate concentrations, and chemical composition of experimental diets. In addition, F-TMR composed with Italian ryegrass silage and corn silage altered ruminal pH and VFA concentrations during in vitro rumen fermentation experiment.

Indexed as

ForageInoculantItalian Ryegrass SilageRumenTotal Mixed Ration

Identifiers

PMID32898945
PMCPMC7961279
OpenAlexW3080188476

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.