Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32898295›Full record

ArticleUltrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology2021

Cross-modality and in-vivo validation of 4D flow MRI evaluation of uterine artery blood flow in human pregnancy.

E Hwuang, P H Wu, A Rodriguez-Soto, M Langham, F W Wehrli, M Vidorreta, B Moon, K Kochar, S Parameshwaran, N Koelper and 4 more

Open access · greenAbstract readEvaluation StudyValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

E HwuangDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7376-2810
P H WuDepartment of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
A Rodriguez-SotoDepartment of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
M LanghamDepartment of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
F W WehrliDepartment of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
M VidorretaSiemens Healthineers, Getafe, Madrid, Spain.
B MoonDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
K KocharDrexel School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
S ParameshwaranMaternal and Child Health Research Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
N KoelperCenter for Research on Reproduction and Women's Health, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
M D TisdallDepartment of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
J A DetreDepartment of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
W WitscheyDepartment of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
N SchwartzMaternal and Child Health Research Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
University of Pennsylvania · USAssociation of Maternal and Child Health Programs · USDrexel University · USSiemens Healthcare (United States) · US

Funding

Training and DisseminationP41EB015893 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI REDDY, RAVINDER · 2012 to 2019
$11.3M
Multidisciplinary Training in Cardiovascular BiologyT32HL007954 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI DAVIES, PETER FRANCIS · 2000 to 2019
$9.9M
Developing a multi-modality, paradigm-shifting approach for in vivo assessment of the human placenta and the impact of maternal nutrition on its development and functionU01HD087180 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI LICHT, DANIEL JACQUES, SCHWARTZ, NADAV · 2015 to 2015
$4.3M
Training Program in Biomedical Imaging and Information SciencesT32EB009384 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI GEE, JAMES C, IVES, ZACHARY · 2009 to 2023
$4.0M
Cardiac MR imaging of hemorrhagic reperfusion injury after myocardial infarctionR01HL137984 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI WITSCHEY, WALTER R.T. · 2018 to 2022
$2.8M
Nuclear Magnetic Tirho Relaxation in Acute and Chronic Myocardial InfarctionsR00HL108157 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI WITSCHEY, WALTER R.T. · 2014 to 2016
$747k
High-Speed Motion-Corrected Pediatric Neuroimaging with MRIR00HD074649 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI TISDALL, MATTHEW DYLAN · 2015 to 2017
$706k
Modeling and Assessment of Maternal Uteroplacental Circulation During PregnancyF31HD100171 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI HWUANG, EILEEN · 2020 to 2020
$46k
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development R00-HD074649Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development U01-HD087180National Science Foundation DGE-1321851NHLBI NIH HHS R00 HL108157NHLBI NIH HHS R00-HL108157NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL137984NHLBI NIH HHS R01-HL137984NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL007954NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB015893NIBIB NIH HHS P41-EB015893NIBIB NIH HHS T32 EB009384NIBIB NIH HHS T32-EB009384NICHD NIH HHS F31 HD100171NICHD NIH HHS R00 HD074649NICHD NIH HHS U01 HD087180
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesClinical assessment of uterine artery (UtA) hemodynamics is currently limited to Doppler ultrasound (US) velocimetry. We have demonstrated previously the feasibility of applying four-dimensional (4D) flow magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to evaluate UtA hemodynamics during pregnancy, allowing flow quantification of the entire course of the vessel. In this study, we sought to further validate the physiological relevance of 4D flow MRI measurement of UtA blood flow by exploring its association with pregnancy outcome relative to US-based metrics.

methodsRecruited into this prospective, cross-sectional study were 87 women with a singleton pregnancy who underwent 4D flow MRI between May 2016 and April 2019 to measure the UtA pulsatility index (MRI-PI) and blood flow rate (MRI-flow, in mL/min). UtA-PI was also measured using US (US-PI). The primary outcome was a composite (COMP) of pre-eclampsia (PE) and/or small-for-gestational-age (SGA) neonate, and secondary outcomes were PE and SGA neonate individually. We assessed the ability of MRI-flow, MRI-PI and US-PI to distinguish between outcomes, and evaluated whether MRI-flow changed as gestation progressed.

resultsFollowing 4D flow postprocessing and exclusions from the analysis, 74 women had 4D flow MRI data analyzed for both UtAs. Of these, 18 developed a COMP outcome: three developed PE only, 11 had a SGA neonate only and four had both. A comparison of the COMP group vs the no-COMP group found no differences in maternal age, body mass index, nulliparity, gravidity or race. For 66 of the 74 subjects, US data were also available. In these subjects, both median MRI-PI (0.95 vs 0.70; P < 0.01) and median US-PI (0.95 vs 0.73; P < 0.01) were significantly increased in subjects in the COMP group compared with those in the no-COMP group. The UtA blood-flow rate, as measured by MRI, did not increase significantly from the second to the third trimester (median flow (interquartile range (IQR)), 543 (419-698) vs 575 (440-746) mL/min; P = 0.77), but it was significantly lower overall in the COMP compared with the no-COMP group (median flow (IQR), 486 (366-598) vs 624 (457-749) mL/min; P = 0.04). The areas under the receiver-operating-characteristics curves for MRI-flow, MRI-PI and US-PI in predicting COMP were not significantly different (0.694, 0.737 and 0.731, respectively; P = 0.87).

conclusions4D flow MRI can yield physiological measures of UtA blood-flow rate and PI that are associated with adverse pregnancy outcome. This may open up new avenues in the future to expand the potential of this technique as a robust tool with which to evaluate UtA hemodynamics in pregnancy. © 2020 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Indexed as

Placental CirculationAdultArea Under CurveBlood Flow VelocityCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleFetal Growth RetardationHemodynamicsHumansInfant, NewbornInfant, Small for Gestational AgeMagnetic Resonance ImagingMultimodal ImagingPredictive Value of TestsPre-EclampsiaPregnancy4D flow MRIDoppler ultrasoundintrauterine growth restrictionpre-eclampsiauterine artery

Identifiers

PMID32898295
PMCPMC8072518
OpenAlexW3084167659

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.