Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32898264›Full record

ArticleMedical mycology2021

Future challenges and chances in the diagnosis and management of invasive mould infections in cancer patients.

Jörg Janne Vehreschild, Philipp Koehler, Frédéric Lamoth, Juergen Prattes, Christina Rieger, Bart J A Rijnders, Daniel Teschner

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical mycology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Jörg Janne VehreschildDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hematology, and Oncology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany; Department I for Internal Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany; German Centre for Infection Research, partner site Bonn-Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Philipp KoehlerUniversity of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf (CIO ABCD), Excellence Center for Medical Mycology (ECMM), Cologne, Germany.
Frédéric LamothInfectious Diseases Service, Department of Medicine, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Juergen PrattesSection of Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Christina RiegerPraxiszentrum Germering, Germering, Germany.
Bart J A RijndersInternal Medicine and Infectious Diseases, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Daniel TeschnerDepartment of Hematology, Medical Oncology, and Pneumology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany.
Cologne Excellence Cluster on Cellular Stress Responses in Aging Associated Diseases · DEErasmus MC · NLGoethe University Frankfurt · DEJohannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DEMedical University of Graz · ATUniversity of Lausanne · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diagnosis, treatment, and management of invasive mould infections (IMI) are challenged by several risk factors, including local epidemiological characteristics, the emergence of fungal resistance and the innate resistance of emerging pathogens, the use of new immunosuppressants, as well as off-target effects of new oncological drugs. The presence of specific host genetic variants and the patient's immune system status may also influence the establishment of an IMI and the outcome of its therapy. Immunological components can thus be expected to play a pivotal role not only in the risk assessment and diagnosis, but also in the treatment of IMI. Cytokines could improve the reliability of an invasive aspergillosis diagnosis by serving as biomarkers as do serological and molecular assays, since they can be easily measured, and the turnaround time is short. The use of immunological markers in the assessment of treatment response could be helpful to reduce overtreatment in high risk patients and allow prompt escalation of antifungal treatment. Mould-active prophylaxis could be better targeted to individual host needs, leading to a targeted prophylaxis in patients with known immunological profiles associated with high susceptibility for IMI, in particular invasive aspergillosis. The alteration of cellular antifungal immune response through oncological drugs and immunosuppressants heavily influences the outcome and may be even more important than the choice of the antifungal treatment. There is a need for the development of new antifungal strategies, including individualized approaches for prevention and treatment of IMI that consider genetic traits of the patients. LAY ABSTRACT: Anticancer and immunosuppressive drugs may alter the ability of the immune system to fight invasive mould infections and may be more important than the choice of the antifungal treatment. Individualized approaches for prevention and treatment of invasive mold infections are needed.

Indexed as

Immunocompromised HostAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntifungal AgentsFemaleHumansInvasive Fungal InfectionsMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsReproducibility of ResultsAntifungal Agentshematologyhemato-oncological malignanciesimmunological statusinvasive pulmonary aspergillosismucormycosis

Identifiers

PMID32898264
PMCPMC7779224
OpenAlexW3084223160

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.