Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32898228›Full record

ArticleJournal of experimental botany2020

How to build an effective research network: lessons from two decades of the GARNet plant science community.

Geraint Parry, Yoselin Benitez-Alfonso, Daniel J Gibbs, Murray Grant, Andrea Harper, C Jill Harrison, Eirini Kaiserli, Sabina Leonelli, Sean May, Sarah McKim and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of experimental botany, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Geraint ParryGARNet, School of Biosciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Yoselin Benitez-AlfonsoCentre for Plant Sciences, University of Leeds, UK.
Daniel J GibbsSchool of Biosciences, University of Birmingham, UK.
Murray GrantSchool of Life Sciences, University of Warwick, UK.
Andrea HarperDepartment of Biology, University of York, UK.
C Jill HarrisonSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Eirini KaiserliInstitute of Molecular, Cell and Systems Biology, University of Glasgow, UK.
Sabina LeonelliExeter Centre for the Study of the Life Sciences, University of Exeter, UK.
Sean MayNottingham Arabidopsis Stock Centre, School of Biosciences, University of Nottingham, UK.
Sarah McKimSchool of Life Sciences, University of Dundee and James Hutton Institute, UK.
Steven SpoelInstitute of Molecular Plant Sciences, University of Edinburgh, UK.
Colin TurnbullDepartment of Life Sciences, Imperial College, UK.
Renier A L van der HoornDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of Oxford, UK.
James MurrayGARNet, School of Biosciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/E022758/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/I001271/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/M004376/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Successful collaborative research is dependent on excellent ideas and innovative experimental approaches, as well as the provision of appropriate support networks. Collaboration requires venues, infrastructures, training facilities, and, perhaps most importantly, a sustained commitment to work together as a community. These activities do not occur without significant effort, yet can be facilitated and overseen by the leadership of a research network that has a clearly defined role to help build resources for their community. Over the past 20 years, this is a role that the UKRI-BBSRC-funded GARNet network has played in the support of the UK curiosity-driven, discovery-led plant science research community. This article reviews the lessons learnt by GARNet in the hope that they can inform the practical implementation of current and future research networks.

Indexed as

CollaborationcommunityGARNetintegrationnetworkresearchresourcestraining

Identifiers

PMID32898228
PMCPMC7906777

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.