Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32898149›Full record

ArticlePLoS medicine2020

Adverse outcomes and mortality in users of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2: A Danish nationwide cohort study.

Lars Christian Lund, Kasper Bruun Kristensen, Mette Reilev, Steffen Christensen, Reimar Wernich Thomsen, Christian Fynbo Christiansen, Henrik Støvring, Nanna Borup Johansen, Nikolai Constantin Brun, Jesper Hallas and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Asthma in patients with coronavirus disease 2019: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology · 2021
    Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Sex differences among users of NSAIDs and opioids during COVID-19 Pandemic.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2023
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Effect of the Duration of NSAID Use on COVID-19.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2022
    Observational
  16. COVID-19 Molecular Pathophysiology: Acetylation of Repurposing Drugs.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Lars Christian LundClinical Pharmacology and Pharmacy, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-8651-6072
Kasper Bruun KristensenClinical Pharmacology and Pharmacy, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-6373-1386
Mette ReilevClinical Pharmacology and Pharmacy, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-1241-4385
Steffen ChristensenDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Reimar Wernich ThomsenDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-9135-3474
Christian Fynbo ChristiansenDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-0727-953X
Henrik StøvringClinical Pharmacology and Pharmacy, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-5821-2351
Nanna Borup JohansenDepartment of Medical Evaluation and Biostatistics, Danish Medicines Agency, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-3764-8532
Nikolai Constantin BrunDepartment of Medical Evaluation and Biostatistics, Danish Medicines Agency, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Jesper HallasClinical Pharmacology and Pharmacy, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-8097-8708
Anton PottegårdClinical Pharmacology and Pharmacy, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-9314-5679

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundConcerns over the safety of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) use during severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection have been raised. We studied whether use of NSAIDs was associated with adverse outcomes and mortality during SARS-CoV-2 infection. METHODS AND

findingsWe conducted a population-based cohort study using Danish administrative and health registries. We included individuals who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 during the period 27 February 2020 to 29 April 2020. NSAID users (defined as individuals having filled a prescription for NSAIDs up to 30 days before the SARS-CoV-2 test) were matched to up to 4 non-users on calendar week of the test date and propensity scores based on age, sex, relevant comorbidities, and use of selected prescription drugs. The main outcome was 30-day mortality, and NSAID users were compared to non-users using risk ratios (RRs) and risk differences (RDs). Secondary outcomes included hospitalization, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, mechanical ventilation, and acute renal replacement therapy. A total of 9,236 SARS-CoV-2 PCR-positive individuals were eligible for inclusion. The median age in the study cohort was 50 years, and 58% were female. Of these, 248 (2.7%) had filled a prescription for NSAIDs, and 535 (5.8%) died within 30 days. In the matched analyses, treatment with NSAIDs was not associated with 30-day mortality (RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.57 to 1.82, p = 0.95; RD 0.1%, 95% CI -3.5% to 3.7%, p = 0.95), risk of hospitalization (RR 1.16, 95% CI 0.87 to 1.53, p = 0.31; RD 3.3%, 95% CI -3.4% to 10%, p = 0.33), ICU admission (RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.54 to 2.02, p = 0.90; RD 0.2%, 95% CI -3.0% to 3.4%, p = 0.90), mechanical ventilation (RR 1.14, 95% CI 0.56 to 2.30, p = 0.72; RD 0.5%, 95% CI -2.5% to 3.6%, p = 0.73), or renal replacement therapy (RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.24 to 3.09, p = 0.81; RD -0.2%, 95% CI -2.0% to 1.6%, p = 0.81). The main limitations of the study are possible exposure misclassification, as not all individuals who fill an NSAID prescription use the drug continuously, and possible residual confounding by indication, as NSAIDs may generally be prescribed to healthier individuals due to their side effects, but on the other hand may also be prescribed for early symptoms of severe COVID-19.

conclusionsUse of NSAIDs was not associated with 30-day mortality, hospitalization, ICU admission, mechanical ventilation, or renal replacement therapy in Danish individuals who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2.

trial registrationThe European Union electronic Register of Post-Authorisation Studies EUPAS34734.

Indexed as

Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalCoronavirus InfectionsPandemicsPneumonia, ViralAdultAgedBetacoronavirusCohort StudiesCOVID-19DenmarkDrug PrescriptionsFemaleHospitalizationHumansIntensive Care UnitsKidneyAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal

Identifiers

PMID32898149
PMCPMC7478808

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.