Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32897798›Full record

ArticleHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2021

Characterization of the UK anthrax vaccine and human immunogenicity.

Tapasvi Modi, David Gervais, Stuart Smith, Julie Miller, Shaan Subramaniam, Konstantinos Thalassinos, Adrian Shepherd

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Human anthrax vaccines: Current status and future prospects.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Designing StablePharmaceutics · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tapasvi ModiPorton Biopharma Limited, Development, Porton Down, Salisbury, Wiltshire, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9079-5657
David GervaisPorton Biopharma Limited, Development, Porton Down, Salisbury, Wiltshire, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4996-3217
Stuart SmithPorton Biopharma Limited, Development, Porton Down, Salisbury, Wiltshire, UK.
Julie MillerPorton Biopharma Limited, Development, Porton Down, Salisbury, Wiltshire, UK.
Shaan SubramaniamInstitute of Structural and Molecular Biology, Division of Biosciences, Darwin Building Room 101A, University College London, London, UK.
Konstantinos ThalassinosInstitute of Structural and Molecular Biology, Division of Biosciences, Darwin Building Room 101A, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5072-8428
Adrian ShepherdDepartment of Biological Sciences and Institute of Structural and Molecular Biology, Birkbeck, University of London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0194-8613
Defence Science and Technology Laboratory · GBInstitute of Structural and Molecular Biology · GB

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 104913/Z/14/ZBM
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The manufacture of the UK Anthrax vaccine (AVP) focuses on the production of Protective Antigen (PA) from the

Indexed as

AnthraxAnthrax VaccinesImmunogenicity, VaccineAntibodies, BacterialAntigens, BacterialBacillus anthracisChromatography, LiquidHumansTandem Mass SpectrometryUnited KingdomAnthrax VaccinesAntibodies, BacterialAntigens, Bacterialanthraxanthrax vaccine precipitatedBacillus anthracisdesorptionMHC-binding predictionproteomics

Identifiers

PMID32897798
PMCPMC7993152
OpenAlexW3084152309

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.