Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32897737›Full record

ArticleJCO clinical cancer informatics2020

Using a Chatbot to Assess Hereditary Cancer Risk.

Brandon M Welch, Caitlin G Allen, Jordon B Ritchie, Heath Morrison, Chanita Hughes-Halbert, Joshua D Schiffman

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JCO clinical cancer informatics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. The Use of Chatbots in Oncological Care: A Narrative Review.International journal of general medicine · 2023
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Brandon M WelchDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC.
Caitlin G AllenDepartment of Behavioral Sciences and Health Education, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA.
Jordon B RitchieDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC.
Heath MorrisonItRunsInMyFamily, Charleston, SC.
Chanita Hughes-HalbertDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC.
Joshua D SchiffmanDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT.
Medical University of South Carolina · USEmory University · USUniversity of Utah · US

Funding

Improving cancer family history collection through social networking and artificial intelligenceK07CA211786 · NCI · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI WELCH, BRANDON M · 2016 to 2020
$867k
Identifying hereditary cancer patients in low-resource community cancer settings using an innovative informatics solutionR41CA239867 · NCI · ITRUNSINMYFAMILY.COM, INC. · PI HUGHES-HALBERT, CHANITA A., WELCH, BRANDON M · 2019 to 2019
$300k
NCI NIH HHS K07 CA211786NCI NIH HHS R41 CA239867
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe developed a Web-based chatbot (ItRunsInMyFamily.com) to help individuals collect their family health history (FHx) and determine their risk for hereditary cancer. The purpose of the current study was to assess the characteristics of users and identify opportunities to improve the FHx collection tool.

methodsDuring Family Health History Month (November 2019) we launched an FHx campaign using social media advertisements to raise awareness about hereditary cancers and encourage individuals in the general population to use ItRunsInMyFamily to collect their FHx. Through this campaign, we were able to gather information about users and identify opportunities to improve the tool.

resultsWe reached 14,140 users in November 2019 through online marketing campaigns-Facebook, Google, previous ItRuns users, and Web site marketing. Of those, 3,204 completed the full FHx assessment and received risk recommendations. The campaign targeted women between age 40 and 60 years. Users came from 3,783 counties around the United States, 48 unique cancers were reported among probands, and 79 unique cancers were reported among family members, an average of two and a half cancers per family.

conclusionOur results demonstrate that it is possible to gather FHx information at the population level, with high levels of engagement and interest in the topic. There is room for future enhancements and improvements to ItRunsInMyFamily to broaden its reach and encourage individuals to learn about and record their health information.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsSocial MediaAdultFemaleGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansMedical History TakingMiddle AgedUnited States

Identifiers

PMID32897737
PMCPMC7529541
OpenAlexW3083816810

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.