Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32897586›Full record

ReviewEnvironmental toxicology and chemistry2021

Assessing the Ecological Risks of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances: Current State-of-the Science and a Proposed Path Forward.

Gerald T Ankley, Philippa Cureton, Robert A Hoke, Magali Houde, Anupama Kumar, Jessy Kurias, Roman Lanno, Chris McCarthy, John Newsted, Christopher J Salice and 4 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Environmental toxicology and chemistry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 93 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
93citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

93 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Adsorption of Forever Chemical Pollutants: The Physical Chemistry of PFAS Near Surfaces.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

33 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Gerald T AnkleyGreat Lakes Toxicology and Ecology Division, US Environmental Protection Agency, Duluth, Minnesota, USA.
Philippa CuretonScience and Risk Assessment Division, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Gatineau, Quebec, Canada.
Robert A HokeDuPont, Wilmington, Delaware, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3120-2882
Magali HoudeAquatic Contaminants Research Division, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Anupama KumarLand and Water, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation Urrbrae, South Australia, Australia.
Jessy KuriasScience and Risk Assessment Division, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Gatineau, Quebec, Canada.
Roman LannoThe Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Chris McCarthyJacobs Engineering, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
John NewstedRamboll, Emeryville, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7271-3972
Christopher J SaliceDepartment of Biological Sciences, Towson University, Towson, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3510-2918
Bradley E SampleEcological Risk, Rancho Murieta, California, USA.
Maria S SepúlvedaDepartment of Forestry and Natural Resources, Purdue University, West Layette, Indiana, USA.
Jeffery SteevensUS Geological Survey, Columbia Environmental Research Center, Columbia, Missouri, USA.
Sara ValsecchiWater Research Institute, National Research Council, Brugherio, Monza and Brianza, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2200-3475

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Per- and poly-fluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) encompass a large, heterogenous group of chemicals of potential concern to human health and the environment. Based on information for a few relatively well-understood PFAS such as perfluorooctane sulfonate and perfluorooctanoate, there is ample basis to suspect that at least a subset can be considered persistent, bioaccumulative, and/or toxic. However, data suitable for determining risks in either prospective or retrospective assessments are lacking for the majority of PFAS. In August 2019, the Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry sponsored a workshop that focused on the state-of-the-science supporting risk assessment of PFAS. The present review summarizes discussions concerning the ecotoxicology and ecological risks of PFAS. First, we summarize currently available information relevant to problem formulation/prioritization, exposure, and hazard/effects of PFAS in the context of regulatory and ecological risk assessment activities from around the world. We then describe critical gaps and uncertainties relative to ecological risk assessments for PFAS and propose approaches to address these needs. Recommendations include the development of more comprehensive monitoring programs to support exposure assessment, an emphasis on research to support the formulation of predictive models for bioaccumulation, and the development of in silico, in vitro, and in vivo methods to efficiently assess biological effects for potentially sensitive species/endpoints. Addressing needs associated with assessing the ecological risk of PFAS will require cross-disciplinary approaches that employ both conventional and new methods in an integrated, resource-effective manner. Environ Toxicol Chem 2021;40:564-605. © 2020 The Authors. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of SETAC. This article has been contributed to by US Government employees and their work is in the public domain in the USA.

Indexed as

FluorocarbonsBioaccumulationEcotoxicologyHumansProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentFluorocarbonsEcological riskPer- and poly-fluoroalkyl substancesReviewStrategy

Identifiers

PMID32897586
PMCPMC7984443

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.