Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32897456›Full record

ArticleAnnals of biomedical engineering2021

Imaging and Simulation of Inter-muscular Differences in Triceps Surae Contributions to Forward Propulsion During Walking.

William H Clark, Richard E Pimentel, Jason R Franz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Design and Evaluation of a Knee Flexion Assistance Exoskeleton for People with Transtibial Amputation.IEEE ... International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics : [proceedings] · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. A robotic emulator for the systematic exploration of transtibial biarticular prosthesis designs.Journal of rehabilitation and assistive technologies engineering
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

William H ClarkJoint Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and North Carolina State University, 10010 Mary Ellen Jones, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA.
Richard E PimentelJoint Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and North Carolina State University, 10010 Mary Ellen Jones, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA.
Jason R FranzJoint Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and North Carolina State University, 10010 Mary Ellen Jones, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA. jrfranz@email.unc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9523-9708

Funding

Tech-DevelopmentP2CHD065690 · NICHD · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI DELP, SCOTT L · 2015 to 2019
$5.4M
National Center for Simulation in Rehabilitation ResearchR24HD065690 · NICHD · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI DELP, SCOTT L · 2010 to 2014
$4.2M
Influence of Age-Related Changes in Tendon on Motor PerformanceR01AG051748 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI BLEMKER, SILVIA SALINAS, THELEN, DARRYL G · 2016 to 2020
$1.8M
The Role of Muscle Dynamics in Governing Achilles Subtendon Behavior Across the LifespanF31AG060675 · NIA · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI CLARK, WILLIAM H · 2019 to 2020
$59k
NIA NIH HHS F31 AG060675NIA NIH HHS F31AG060675NIA NIH HHS R01 AG051748NIA NIH HHS R01AG051748NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD065690NICHD NIH HHS R24 HD065690NIH HHS NIH P2C HD065690
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Forward propulsion during the push-off phase of walking is largely governed at the ankle by differential neuromechanical contributions from the biarticular medial (MG) and lateral gastrocnemii (LG) and the uniarticular soleus (SOL). However, the relative contribution of these individual muscles to forward propulsion is equivocal, with important implications for the design and control of wearable assistive devices and for targeted therapeutics. The aim of this study was to evaluate the agreement between empirical and model-predicted triceps surae (i.e., MG, LG, and SOL) contributions to forward propulsion during walking using conditions that systematically manipulated both walking speed and the mechanical demand for forward propulsion at a fixed speed-through the use of aiding and impeding forces. Ten young adults (age: 24.1 ± 3.6 years, 6M/4F) participated. We found that muscle-specific responses derived from experimental measurements (i.e., activation and fascicle behavior) were consistent with those derived from musculoskeletal simulations (i.e., muscle force and positive mechanical work) within the same subjects. In vivo, compared to walking normally, only LG muscle activation was affected by both aiding and impeding forces. Similarly, increased propulsive demand elicited greater relative fascicle shortening in the MG but not the SOL. In silico, only MG and LG force and positive mechanical work increased significantly to meet the increased demands for forward propulsion. By combining electromyography, ultrasound imaging, and musculoskeletal modeling in the same subjects, our cumulative findings suggest that the biarticular gastrocnemius muscles play a more significant role than the uniarticular soleus in governing changes in forward propulsion during the mid to late stance phase of walking.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalAdultComputer SimulationElectromyographyFemaleHumansMaleMuscle, SkeletalUltrasonographyWalkingYoung AdultForward propulsionNeuromechanicsOpenSimTriceps suraeUltrasound

Identifiers

PMID32897456
PMCPMC8020010

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.