Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32897371›Full record

SynthesisJAMA network open2020

Validation of Progression-Free Survival Rate at 6 Months and Objective Response for Estimating Overall Survival in Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Trials: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Peey-Sei Kok, Doah Cho, Won-Hee Yoon, Georgia Ritchie, Ian Marschner, Sally Lord, Michael Friedlander, John Simes, Chee Khoon Lee

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in JAMA network open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05998993 (Phase II Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of SBRT as an Adjunctive Intervention for Oligoresidual Disease in EGFR Mutant NSCLC With First-Line Osimertinib Treatment), which is not on this map. Cited by 30 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05998993 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Phase II Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of SBRT as an Adjunctive Intervention for Oligoresidual Disease in EGFR Mutant NSCLC With First-Line Osimertinib Treatment

TypeinterventionalSponsorCentro de Tratamiento e Investigación sobre Cáncer, Luis Carlos Sarmiento AnguloRan2023 to 2028Enrolled35ConditionsEGF-R Positive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer, Non Small Cell Lung Cancer, EGFR Exon 19 Deletion, EGFR Exon 21 MutationArmsStereotactic Body Radiation Therapy SBRT
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Performance of a tracked ultrasound navigation setup for pediatric tumor surgery: a phantom study.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2026
    Article
  8. High-Grade Immune-Related Adverse Events Resulting from Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Treatment: Evaluation of Diagnostics and Outcomes in Admitted Patients.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Development and optimization of Eva1 (Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Peey-Sei KokNational Health and Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Doah ChoNational Health and Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Won-Hee YoonCancer Care Centre, St George Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
Georgia RitchieMid North Coast Cancer Institute, Port Macquarie Base Hospital, Port Macquarie, Australia.
Ian MarschnerNational Health and Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Sally LordNational Health and Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Michael FriedlanderNelune Cancer Centre, Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
John SimesNational Health and Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Chee Khoon LeeNational Health and Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
National Health and Medical Research Council · AUSt George Hospital · AUUniversity of Sydney · AUCamden and Campbelltown Hospitals · AUPort Macquarie Base Hospital · AUPrince of Wales Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Progression-free survival (PFS) rate at 6 months has been proposed as a potential surrogate for overall survival (OS) rate at 12 months for immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) trials but requires further assessment for validation. Objective: To validate 6-month PFS and objective response rate (ORR) as estimators of 12-month OS in the ICI arms of randomized clinical trials (RCTs). Data Sources: Electronic databases (Medline, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) were searched for ICI RCTs published between January 2000 and June 2019. Study Selection: Eligible studies were phase 2 and phase 3 ICI RCTs in advanced solid cancers that reported ORR, PFS, and OS. A total of 99 articles (from 60 studies) of 2502 articles were selected by consensus. Data Extraction and Synthesis: Data were screened and extracted independently. Estimation models for 12-month OS and to assess correlation coefficient between end points were developed using linear regression. Data were extracted in July 2019, and analyses were conducted in September 2019. This study is reported following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) reporting guideline. Main Outcomes and Measures: Validation of previously reported 6-month PFS and ORR estimation models for 12-month OS using contemporary RCTs. Calibration of 6-month PFS and ORR model-estimated vs observed 12-month OS in ICI arms were assessed by correlation coefficient (r) and weighted Brier scores. Secondary analyses were performed for subgroups (ie, ICI-only, ICI-combination, line of therapy, programmed cell death 1 ligand 1 selected, and unselected). Results: Data from 60 RCTs with 74 experimental ICI arms were used. The development data set included 25 arms from studies published January 2000 to January 2017. The estimation model for 12-month OS using 6-month PFS was: (1.06 × PFS6) + 0.16 + (0.04 × melanoma) - (0.03 × NSCLC) + (0 × other tumors), in which PFS6 indicates 6-month PFS and NSCLC indicates non-small cell lung cancer. The estimation model for 12-month OS using ORR was (0.15 × ORR) + 0.52 + (0 × melanoma) - (0.02 × NSCLC) - (0.01 × other tumors). A total of 49 arms from studies published after January 2017 to June 2019 formed the validation data set. When the models were applied on the validation data set, calibration between the 6-month PFS model estimated vs observed 12-month OS was good (r = 0.89; Brier score, 0.008), but poor for the ORR model (r = 0.47; Brier score, 0.03). Findings were similar across all subgroups. Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of this study suggest that the estimation model using 6-month PFS could reliably estimate 12-month OS in ICI trials. This study could assist in better selection and prioritization of ICI agents for testing in RCTs based on phase 2 single-arm RCT results.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsHumansImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsNeoplasm StagingOutcome Assessment, Health CareProgression-Free SurvivalRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicReproducibility of ResultsImmune Checkpoint Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID32897371
PMCPMC7489825
OpenAlexW3084135554

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.