SynthesisJAMA network open2020
Validation of Progression-Free Survival Rate at 6 Months and Objective Response for Estimating Overall Survival in Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Trials: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Synthesis in JAMA network open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05998993 (Phase II Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of SBRT as an Adjunctive Intervention for Oligoresidual Disease in EGFR Mutant NSCLC With First-Line Osimertinib Treatment), which is not on this map. Cited by 30 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Phase II Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of SBRT as an Adjunctive Intervention for Oligoresidual Disease in EGFR Mutant NSCLC With First-Line Osimertinib Treatment
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.
- Risk-Benefit of Phase 2 Monotherapy Trials in Adult Solid Cancers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.International journal of cancer · 2026Pooled it
- Optimal early endpoint for second-line or subsequent immune checkpoint inhibitors in previously treated advanced solid cancers: a systematic review.BMC cancer · 2025Pooled it
- Genomic and transcriptomic profiles associated with response to eribulin and nivolumab combination in HER-2-negative metastatic breast cancer.Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII · 2024Trial
- A signal-seeking Phase 2 study of olaparib and durvalumab in advanced solid cancers with homologous recombination repair gene alterations.British journal of cancer · 2023Trial
- Trial
- Evaluating the potential of candidate surrogate endpoints for overall survival in treatment-naive metastatic melanoma treated with anti-PD-1-based regimens with or without anti-CTLA-4 therapy.Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2026Article
- Performance of a tracked ultrasound navigation setup for pediatric tumor surgery: a phantom study.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2026Article
- High-Grade Immune-Related Adverse Events Resulting from Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Treatment: Evaluation of Diagnostics and Outcomes in Admitted Patients.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Article
- Machine learning models using serum gastric biomarkers for the non-invasive prediction of atrophic gastritis: a comparative study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Development and optimization of Eva1 (Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2025Article
- Proportion of patients in phase 2 oncology trials receiving treatments that are ultimately approved.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2025Article
- Monitoring peripheral blood data supports the prediction of immunotherapy response in advanced non-small cell lung cancer based on real-world data.Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII · 2025Article
- Integrating mitochondrial and lysosomal gene analysis for breast cancer prognosis using machine learning.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Machine Learning-Based Survival Analysis for Patients Receiving Lenvatinib for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma.Journal of hepatocellular carcinoma · 2025Article
- Prognostic impact of LILRB4 expression on tumor-infiltrating cells in resected non-small cell lung cancer.Thoracic cancer · 2023Article
- Assessment of Surrogate End Point Trends in Clinical Trials to Approve Oncology Drugs From 2001 to 2020 in Japan.JAMA network open · 2023Article
- Real-World Treatment Patterns and Effectiveness of Targeted and Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Based Systemic Therapy inJTO clinical and research reports · 2023Article
- Correlation of Anticancer Drug Prices with Outcomes of Overall Survival and Progression-Free Survival in Clinical Trials in Japan.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2023Article
- Stage as the Sole "Biomarker" for Adjuvant Pembrolizumab in Resected Stage IB to IIIA NSCLC without Considerations for PD-L1 Expression Level, ALK/EGFR Mutational Status, and Prior Adjuvant Chemotherapy per FDA Approval Indications of PEARLS/Keynote-091?Lung Cancer (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2023Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Progression-free survival (PFS) rate at 6 months has been proposed as a potential surrogate for overall survival (OS) rate at 12 months for immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) trials but requires further assessment for validation. Objective: To validate 6-month PFS and objective response rate (ORR) as estimators of 12-month OS in the ICI arms of randomized clinical trials (RCTs). Data Sources: Electronic databases (Medline, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) were searched for ICI RCTs published between January 2000 and June 2019. Study Selection: Eligible studies were phase 2 and phase 3 ICI RCTs in advanced solid cancers that reported ORR, PFS, and OS. A total of 99 articles (from 60 studies) of 2502 articles were selected by consensus. Data Extraction and Synthesis: Data were screened and extracted independently. Estimation models for 12-month OS and to assess correlation coefficient between end points were developed using linear regression. Data were extracted in July 2019, and analyses were conducted in September 2019. This study is reported following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) reporting guideline. Main Outcomes and Measures: Validation of previously reported 6-month PFS and ORR estimation models for 12-month OS using contemporary RCTs. Calibration of 6-month PFS and ORR model-estimated vs observed 12-month OS in ICI arms were assessed by correlation coefficient (r) and weighted Brier scores. Secondary analyses were performed for subgroups (ie, ICI-only, ICI-combination, line of therapy, programmed cell death 1 ligand 1 selected, and unselected). Results: Data from 60 RCTs with 74 experimental ICI arms were used. The development data set included 25 arms from studies published January 2000 to January 2017. The estimation model for 12-month OS using 6-month PFS was: (1.06 × PFS6) + 0.16 + (0.04 × melanoma) - (0.03 × NSCLC) + (0 × other tumors), in which PFS6 indicates 6-month PFS and NSCLC indicates non-small cell lung cancer. The estimation model for 12-month OS using ORR was (0.15 × ORR) + 0.52 + (0 × melanoma) - (0.02 × NSCLC) - (0.01 × other tumors). A total of 49 arms from studies published after January 2017 to June 2019 formed the validation data set. When the models were applied on the validation data set, calibration between the 6-month PFS model estimated vs observed 12-month OS was good (r = 0.89; Brier score, 0.008), but poor for the ORR model (r = 0.47; Brier score, 0.03). Findings were similar across all subgroups. Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of this study suggest that the estimation model using 6-month PFS could reliably estimate 12-month OS in ICI trials. This study could assist in better selection and prioritization of ICI agents for testing in RCTs based on phase 2 single-arm RCT results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.