Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32897363›Full record

ArticleNeuro-oncology2020

Development of a gene expression-based prognostic signature for IDH wild-type glioblastoma.

Radia M Johnson, Heidi S Phillips, Carlos Bais, Cameron W Brennan, Timothy F Cloughesy, Anneleen Daemen, Ulrich Herrlinger, Robert B Jenkins, Albert Lai, Christoph Mancao and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuro-oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Prognostic Markers of DNA Methylation and Next-Generation Sequencing in Progressive Glioblastoma from the EORTC-26101 Trial.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2023
    Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. IGF2BPs as novel mGenes & diseases · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Targeting IGF2BP3 in Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  13. Glioblastoma Clinical Trials: Current Landscape and Opportunities for Improvement.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2022
    Review
  14. Article
  15. The NTheranostics · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Radia M JohnsonDepartment of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, Genentech Inc, South San Francisco, California, USA.
Heidi S PhillipsDepartment of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, Genentech Inc, South San Francisco, California, USA.
Carlos BaisOncology Biomarker Development, Genentech Inc., South San Francisco, California, USA.
Cameron W BrennanDepartment of Neurosurgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Timothy F CloughesyDepartment of Neurology, University of California Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles, California, USA.
Anneleen DaemenDepartment of Translational Medicine, ORIC Pharmaceuticals Inc, South San Francisco, California, USA.
Ulrich HerrlingerDivision of Clinical Neurooncology, Department of Neurology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Robert B JenkinsDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Albert LaiDepartment of Neurology, University of California Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles, California, USA.
Christoph MancaoOncology Biomarker Development, Genentech Inc., Basel, Switzerland.
Michael WellerDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Wolfgang WickDepartment of Neurology, Ruprecht-Karls University Heidelberg and German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany.
Richard BourgonDepartment of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, Genentech Inc, South San Francisco, California, USA.
Josep GarciaGlobal Clinical Development, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
UCLA SPORE in Brain CancerP50CA211015 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI Yvonne Yu-Hsuan Chen · 2017 to 2026
$25.2M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS P50 CA211015Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe aimed to develop a gene expression-based prognostic signature for isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) wild-type glioblastoma using clinical trial datasets representative of glioblastoma clinical trial populations.

methodsSamples were collected from newly diagnosed patients with IDH wild-type glioblastoma in the ARTE, TAMIGA, EORTC 26101 (referred to as "ATE"), AVAglio, and GLARIUS trials, or treated at UCLA. Transcriptional profiling was achieved with the NanoString gene expression platform. To identify genes prognostic for overall survival (OS), we built an elastic net penalized Cox proportional hazards regression model using the discovery ATE dataset. For validation in independent datasets (AVAglio, GLARIUS, UCLA), we combined elastic net-selected genes into a robust z-score signature (ATE score) to overcome gene expression platform differences between discovery and validation cohorts.

resultsNanoString data were available from 512 patients in the ATE dataset. Elastic net identified a prognostic signature of 9 genes (CHEK1, GPR17, IGF2BP3, MGMT, MTHFD1L, PTRH2, SOX11, S100A9, and TFRC). Translating weighted elastic net scores to the ATE score conserved the prognostic value of the genes. The ATE score was prognostic for OS in the ATE dataset (P < 0.0001), as expected, and in the validation cohorts (AVAglio, P < 0.0001; GLARIUS, P = 0.02; UCLA, P = 0.004). The ATE score remained prognostic following adjustment for O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation status and corticosteroid use at baseline. A positive correlation between ATE score and proneural/proliferative subtypes was observed in patients with MGMT non-methylated promoter status.

conclusionsThe ATE score showed prognostic value and may enable clinical trial stratification for IDH wild-type glioblastoma.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsGlioblastomaDNA MethylationDNA Modification MethylasesDNA Repair EnzymesHumansIsocitrate DehydrogenasePrognosisReceptors, G-Protein-CoupledDNA Modification MethylasesDNA Repair EnzymesGPR17 protein, humanIsocitrate DehydrogenaseReceptors, G-Protein-Coupledgene expressionglioblastomaNanoStringoverall survivalprognostic signature

Identifiers

PMID32897363
PMCPMC7746941

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.