ArticleThe Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology2020
Clinical comparative analysis of various duodenal diseases in different age groups.
Article in The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
aimsThis study aimed to investigate the differences and relevance of various common duodenal diseases in different parts in the aspects of age, gender, helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection, application of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), smoking, or alcohol consumption. MATERIALS AND
methodsThe medical records of various duodenal diseases were collected and tested for difference using the χ2 test or the Fisher exact probability method.
results1) The proportions of duodenal ulcer (DU), inflammation, and duodenal bulb diseases in the adult group (A) (47.98%, 36.70%, and 66.63%) were higher than those in the elderly group (E) (41.38%, 29.83%, and 56.82%), but the proportions of duodenal diverticulum (DD) and tumor diseases in the descending and ascending segments (2.95%, 1.43%, 9.14%, and 0.14%) were lower than those in group E (13.73%, 3.69%, 19.41%, and 0.76%) (p<0.001). 2) The positive rate of H. pylori (63.64%) in the duodenal bulb diseases was higher than that in the bulb-descending segment (53.75%), but the application rate of NSAIDs (16.44%) in the duodenal bulb-descending diseases was lower than that in the descending segment (24.81%) (p<0.001).
conclusion1) DU, inflammation, and duodenal bulb diseases are common in adults, but DD and tumor diseases in the descending and ascending segments are more common in the elderly. 2) Compared with the duodenal bulb-descending diseases, the application of NSAIDs has greater impact on the diseases in the descending segment, and the rate of H. pylori infection is higher in duodenal bulb diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.