Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32896799›Full record

ArticleSocial science & medicine (1982)2020

iSAY (incentives for South African youth): Stated preferences of young people living with HIV.

Omar Galárraga, Caroline Kuo, Bulelwa Mtukushe, Brendan Maughan-Brown, Abigail Harrison, Jackie Hoare

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Social science & medicine (1982), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. The application of discrete choice experiments eliciting young peoples' preferences for healthcare: a systematic literature review.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2023
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Omar GalárragaBrown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, USA. Electronic address: omar_galarraga@brown.edu.
Caroline KuoBrown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, USA; University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Bulelwa MtukusheUniversity of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Brendan Maughan-BrownUniversity of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Abigail HarrisonBrown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, USA; University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Jackie HoareUniversity of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
University of Cape Town · ZABrown University · US

Funding

Conditional Economic Incentives for Improving Adolescent Adherence to HIV TreatmentR21AI118393 · NIAID · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI GALARRAGA, OMAR, HOARE, JACQUELINE · 2016 to 2017
$404k
NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI118393
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High adherence to antiretroviral therapy (ART) is essential for achieving viral suppression and preventing HIV transmission. Yet adherence is suboptimal among adolescents who face unique adherence challenges. Little is known about the role of conditional economic incentives (CEIs) for increasing ART adherence in this population. During 2017-2019, we conducted a mixed-methods discrete choice experiment in Cape Town, South Africa to inform the optimal design of a CEI intervention for ART adherence among youth. In-depth interviews were conducted with n = 35 adolescents (10-19 years old) living with HIV and prescribed ART, to identify attributes of a youth-centered CEI intervention for ART adherence. A discrete choice experiment was subsequently conducted with N = 168 adolescents to elicit preferences for intervention components. A rank-ordered mixed logit model was used for main results; marginal willingness-to-accept (mWTA) was then estimated. Five attributes emerged from the qualitative research as important for a CEI-based intervention for youth ART adherence: (1) incentive amount, (2) incentive format, (3) incentive recipient, (4) delivery mode, and (5) program participants. Youth had a high probability of acceptance of any incentives program (88-100%), yet they did not have a strong preference of a quarterly over a monthly program. From a maximum incentive amount of R1920 (~US$115), youth were willing to forgo up to R126 per year (~US$9) if the incentive was given in cash (versus fashion vouchers); R274 (~US$19.6) if it was open to both previously adherent and non-adherent youth (instead of non-adherent only); and up to R91 (~US$6.5) to receive incentives at a clinic setting (instead of electronically). The use of incentives over the short term during the critical age- and developmental-transition, when adolescents begin to take sole responsibility for their medication-taking behaviors, holds great promise for habituating adherence into adulthood.

Indexed as

HIV InfectionsMedication AdherenceMotivationAdolescentAdultBlack PeopleChildFemaleHumansQualitative ResearchSouth AfricaYoung AdultAntiretroviral therapy adherenceConditional economic incentivesDiscrete choice experimentHIVMixed methodsPatient preferencesSouth AfricaYoung people

Identifiers

PMID32896799
PMCPMC7738405
OpenAlexW3081676700

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.