Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32896591›Full record

ArticleToxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA2020

Toxicological analysis of aerosols derived from three electronic nicotine delivery systems using normal human bronchial epithelial cells.

K Pearce, N Gray, P Gaur, J Jeon, A Suarez, J Shannahan, R S Pappas, C Watson-Wright

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Vaping and Respiratory Viruses: The End for ENDS?American journal of respiratory cell and molecular biology · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

K PearceSchool of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA 30030, United States of America.
N GrayTobacco Inorganics Group, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30341, United States of America.
P GaurSchool of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA 30030, United States of America.
J JeonSchool of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA 30030, United States of America.
A SuarezSchool of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA 30030, United States of America.
J ShannahanSchool of Health Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, United States of America.
R S PappasTobacco Inorganics Group, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30341, United States of America.
C Watson-WrightSchool of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA 30030, United States of America. Electronic address: cwright92@gsu.edu.
Georgia State University · USCenters for Disease Control and Prevention · USPurdue University West Lafayette · US

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) are a rapidly growing global market advertised as a safer alternative to combustible cigarettes. However, comprehensive investigations of END aerosol physicochemical and toxicological properties have not been fully explored across brands to assess relative safety. In this study, we evaluated aerosols collected from three ENDS - Juul Fruit Medley (5% nicotine), Logic Power (2.4% nicotine), and Mistic (1.8% nicotine). ENDS aerosols were generated using standard machine puffing regimen and collected with a novel fluoropolymer condensation trap. Triple quadrupole-inductively coupled plasma-mass determined the presence of heavy metals in collected aerosols. The toxicological effects of ENDS aerosols on normal human bronchial epithelial cells (NHBE) were investigated using cellular viability, reactive oxygen species, oxidative stress assays, along with DNA damage assessments using the CometChip©. Results indicated the total metal concentrations within collected ENDS aerosols were higher for Mistic and Logic compared to Juul. Logic Power aerosols elicited higher reactive oxygen species levels than Mistic and Juul in NHBE after 24-h exposure. Similar dose-dependent reductions of cellular viability and total glutathione were found for each exposure. However, Logic and Juul aerosols caused greater single stranded DNA damage compared to Mistic. Our study indicates that regardless of brand, ENDS aerosols are toxic to upper airway epithelial cells and may pose a potential respiratory hazard to occasional and frequent users.

Indexed as

Electronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsBronchiCell LineCell SurvivalDNA DamageE-Cigarette VaporEpithelial CellsHumansMetals, HeavyOxidative StressReactive Oxygen SpeciesE-Cigarette VaporMetals, HeavyReactive Oxygen SpeciesAerosolsAirway epithelial cellsElectronic nicotine delivery systemsHeavy metalsToxicity

Identifiers

PMID32896591
PMCPMC7877193
OpenAlexW3083690118

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.