Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32896498›Full record

Trial reportAmerican journal of ophthalmology2021

Aqueous Cytokine Expression and Higher Order OCT Biomarkers: Assessment of the Anatomic-Biologic Bridge in the IMAGINE DME Study.

Joseph R Abraham, Charles C Wykoff, Sruthi Arepalli, Leina Lunasco, Hannah J Yu, Ming Hu, Jamie Reese, Sunil K Srivastava, David M Brown, Justis P Ehlers

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in American journal of ophthalmology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Joseph R AbrahamTony and Leona Campane Center for Excellence in Image-Guided Surgery and Advanced Imaging Research, Cole Eye Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Charles C WykoffRetina Consultants of Houston, Retina Consultants of America, Houston, Texas, USA; Blanton Eye Institute, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas, USA.
Sruthi ArepalliTony and Leona Campane Center for Excellence in Image-Guided Surgery and Advanced Imaging Research, Cole Eye Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA; Vitreoretinal Service, Cole Eye Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Leina LunascoTony and Leona Campane Center for Excellence in Image-Guided Surgery and Advanced Imaging Research, Cole Eye Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Hannah J YuRetina Consultants of Houston, Retina Consultants of America, Houston, Texas, USA.
Ming HuTony and Leona Campane Center for Excellence in Image-Guided Surgery and Advanced Imaging Research, Cole Eye Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA; Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Jamie ReeseTony and Leona Campane Center for Excellence in Image-Guided Surgery and Advanced Imaging Research, Cole Eye Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Sunil K SrivastavaTony and Leona Campane Center for Excellence in Image-Guided Surgery and Advanced Imaging Research, Cole Eye Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA; Vitreoretinal Service, Cole Eye Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
David M BrownRetina Consultants of Houston, Retina Consultants of America, Houston, Texas, USA; Blanton Eye Institute, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas, USA.
Justis P EhlersTony and Leona Campane Center for Excellence in Image-Guided Surgery and Advanced Imaging Research, Cole Eye Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA; Vitreoretinal Service, Cole Eye Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA. Electronic address: ehlersj@ccf.org.
Cleveland Clinic · USMethodist Hospital · USRetina Consultants of Texas · US

Funding

RESOURCE/SERVICE CORE C - MOLECULAR INFORMATICS MODULEP30EY025585 · NEI · CLEVELAND CLINIC LERNER COM-CWRU · PI BELA ANAND-APTE · 2016 to 2026
$7.7M
Intraoperative Optical Coherence Tomography for Ophthalmic SurgeryK23EY022947 · NEI · CLEVELAND CLINIC LERNER COM-CWRU · PI EHLERS, JUSTIS · 2013 to 2017
$1.0M
NEI NIH HHS K23 EY022947NEI NIH HHS P30 EY025585
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo identify biomarkers for predicting response to anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy in diabetic macular edema (DME) and evaluate any links between cytokine expression and optical coherence tomography (OCT) phenotype.

designThe IMAGINE is a post hoc image analysis and cytokine expression assessment of the Efficacy & Safety Trial of Intravitreal Injections Combined With PRP for CSME Secondary to Diabetes Mellitus (DAVE) randomized clinical trial.

methodsSubjects were categorized as anatomical responders or nonresponders, and within the responder group as rebounders and non-rebounders based on quantitative, longitudinal OCT criteria. Retinal layer and fluid features were extracted using an OCT machine-learning augmented segmentation platform. Responders were further sub-classified by rapidity of response. Aqueous concentrations of 54 cytokines were measured at multiple timepoints. Expression was compared between responder groups and correlated with OCT imaging biomarkers.

resultsOf the 24 eyes studied, 79% were anatomical responders with 38% super responders, 17% early responders, and 25% slow responders. Twenty-one percent were nonresponders. Super responders had increased baseline vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) (880.0 pg/mL vs 245.4 pg/mL; P = .012) and decreased monocyte chemotactic protein-1 (MCP-1) (513.3 pg/mL vs 809.5 pg/mL; P = .0.042) concentrations compared with nonresponders. Interleukin-6 (-24.9 pg/mL vs 442.8 pg/mL; P = .032) concentrations increased among nonresponders during therapy. VEGF concentrations correlated with central subfield thickness (r = 0.49; P = .01). Panmacular retinal volume correlated with increased interleuckin-6 (r = 0.47; P = .02) and decreased MCP-1 (r = -0.45; P = .03). Matrix metallopeptidase-1 correlated with subretinal fluid volume (r = 0.50; P = .01).

conclusionsOCT imaging biomarkers correlated with both intraocular cytokines and responsiveness to anti-VEGF therapy, which indicated a possible link to underlying pathways and their relevance to DME prognosis. Baseline concentrations of VEGF and MCP-1 are associated with anatomic response to anti-VEGF therapy.

Indexed as

Visual AcuityAdultAgedAngiogenesis InhibitorsAqueous HumorBiomarkersCytokinesDiabetic RetinopathyFemaleHumansIntravitreal InjectionsMacula LuteaMacular EdemaMaleMiddle AgedTomography, Optical CoherenceAngiogenesis InhibitorsBiomarkersCytokinesVascular Endothelial Growth Factor A

Identifiers

PMID32896498
PMCPMC9719825
OpenAlexW3083259832

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.