Trial reportFertility and sterility2020
Low-dose aspirin in reproductive health: effects on menstrual cycle characteristics.
Trial report in Fertility and sterility, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00467363 (The Effects of Aspirin in Gestation and Reproduction), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The Effects of Aspirin in Gestation and Reproduction: A Multi-center, Controlled, Double-blind Randomized Trial.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- IVF/ICSI outcomes of euthyroid infertile women with thyroid autoimmunity: does treatment with aspirin plus prednisone matter?BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2022Article
- Exploration and Practice of "Internet + Maker Education" University Innovative Entrepreneurship Education Model From the Perspective of Positive Psychology.Frontiers in psychology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo estimate the effect of daily 81 mg low-dose aspirin (LDA) on menstrual cycle length and hormone profiles.
designSecondary analysis of a trial evaluating the effect of daily LDA or placebo on live birth among women with one or two previous pregnancy losses.
settingUniversity medical centers. PATIENT(S): A total of 915 regularly menstruating women who had at least one menstrual cycle (3,190 total cycles) in which pregnancy did not occur. INTERVENTION(S): Randomized allocation to LDA versus placebo. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Menstrual cycle length and follicular and luteal phases were measured. Urinary pregnanediol glucuronide, follicle-stimulating hormone, luteinizing hormone, and estrone-3-glucuronide were assessed up to six times during the first two cycles. Generalized estimating equations estimated relative risk of short (<25th percentile: <27 days) and long (>75th percentile: ≥32 days) versus normal cycle length. Linear mixed models estimated mean hormone level differences with weights used to account for multiple cycles contributed per participant. RESULT(S): There were no significant differences in total menstrual cycle, follicular phase, or luteal phase length between LDA and placebo groups. LDA posed no greater risk of having a short versus normal-length or long versus normal-length follicular phase, or having a short versus normal-length or long versus normal-length luteal phase. There were no significant differences in hormone levels across the menstrual cycle between the LDA and placebo groups. CONCLUSION(S): Daily LDA use did not result in any changes to menstrual cycle, follicular phase, or luteal phase length or hormone levels across the menstrual cycle compared with placebo. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT00467363.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.