Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32896292›Full record

Trial reportLancet (London, England)2020

Azithromycin in addition to standard of care versus standard of care alone in the treatment of patients admitted to the hospital with severe COVID-19 in Brazil (COALITION II): a randomised clinical trial.

Remo H M Furtado, Otavio Berwanger, Henrique A Fonseca, Thiago D Corrêa, Leonardo R Ferraz, Maura G Lapa, Fernando G Zampieri, Viviane C Veiga, Luciano C P Azevedo, Regis G Rosa and 24 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Lancet (London, England), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04321278 (Evaluation of the Safety and Clinical Efficacy of Hydroxychloroquine Associated With Azithromycin in Patients With Pneumonia Caused by Infection by the SARS-CoV2 Virus - Coalition COVID-19 Brasil II - SEVERE - Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 214 papers, 22 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
214citing papers in PubMed, 22 pooled it
8.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04321278 phase3completednot on this map

Evaluation of the Safety and Clinical Efficacy of Hydroxychloroquine Associated With Azithromycin in Patients With Pneumonia Caused by Infection by the SARS-CoV2 Virus - Coalition COVID-19 Brasil II - SEVERE - Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorHospital Israelita Albert EinsteinRan2020 to 2020Enrolled440ConditionsCoronavirus Infections, Pneumonia, ViralArmsHydroxychloroquine + azithromycin, Hydroxychloroquine
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

214 citing papers in PubMed, 22 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 369 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Guideline
  11. Pooled it
  12. Antibiotics for the treatment of COVID-19.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Pooled it
  15. Pooled it
  16. Pooled it
  17. Guideline
  18. Current evidence for COVID-19 therapies: a systematic literature review.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2021
    Pooled it
  19. Pooled it
  20. Pooled it

154 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

34 authors at 8 institutions in 3 countries.

Remo H M FurtadoHospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brazil; Instituto do Coração, Hospital das Clinicas da Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, Brazil.
Otavio BerwangerHospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brazil. Electronic address: otavio.berwanger@einstein.br.
Henrique A FonsecaHospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brazil.
Thiago D CorrêaHospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brazil; Brazilian Research in Intensive Care Network, São Paulo, Brazil.
Leonardo R FerrazHospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brazil.
Maura G LapaHospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brazil.
Fernando G ZampieriBrazilian Research in Intensive Care Network, São Paulo, Brazil; HCor Research Institute, São Paulo, Brazil.
Viviane C VeigaBrazilian Research in Intensive Care Network, São Paulo, Brazil; BP-A Beneficência Portuguesa de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Luciano C P AzevedoBrazilian Research in Intensive Care Network, São Paulo, Brazil; Hospital Sírio Libanês Research and Education Institute, São Paulo, Brazil.
Regis G RosaBrazilian Research in Intensive Care Network, São Paulo, Brazil; Hospital Moinhos de Vento, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Renato D LopesBrazilian Clinical Research Institute, São Paulo, Brazil; Duke University Medical Centre, Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC, USA.
Alvaro AvezumInternational Research Center, Hospital Alemão Oswaldo Cruz, São Paulo, Brazil.
Airton L O ManoelHospital Moyses Deustche (MBoi Mirim), São Paulo, Brazil.
Felipe M T PizaHospital Moyses Deustche (MBoi Mirim), São Paulo, Brazil.
Priscilla A MartinsHospital Estadual Jayme dos Santos Neves, Serra, Brazil.
Thiago C LisboaHospital de Clínicas, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Adriano J PereiraHospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brazil; Hospital Vila Santa Catarina, São Paulo, Brazil.
Guilherme B OlivatoHospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brazil; Hospital Vila Santa Catarina, São Paulo, Brazil.
Vicente C S DantasHospital Naval Marcílio Dias, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Eveline P MilanHospital Giselda Trigueiro, Natal, Brazil.
Otavio C E GebaraHospital Santa Paula, São Paulo, Brazil.
Roberto B AmazonasEMS Pharma, Hortolândia, Brazil.
Monalisa B OliveiraEMS Pharma, Hortolândia, Brazil.
Ronaldo V P SoaresHospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brazil.
Diogo D F MoiaHospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brazil.
Luciana P A PianoHospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brazil.
Kleber CastilhoHospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brazil.
Roberta G R A P MomessoHospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brazil.
Guilherme P P SchettinoHospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brazil.
Luiz Vicente RizzoHospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brazil.
Ary Serpa NetoHospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brazil; Brazilian Research in Intensive Care Network, São Paulo, Brazil; Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Flávia R MachadoBrazilian Research in Intensive Care Network, São Paulo, Brazil; Department of Anesthesiology, Pain and Intensive Care Medicine, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Alexandre B CavalcantiBrazilian Research in Intensive Care Network, São Paulo, Brazil; HCor Research Institute, São Paulo, Brazil.
COALITION COVID-19 Brazil II Investigators
Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein · BRBrazilian Research in Intensive Care Network · BRBeneficência Portuguesa de São Paulo · BRClinical Research Institute · USHospital Alemão Oswaldo Cruz · BRHospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre · BRHospital Santa Paula · BRHospital Sírio-Libanês · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe efficacy and safety of azithromycin in the treatment of COVID-19 remain uncertain. We assessed whether adding azithromycin to standard of care, which included hydroxychloroquine, would improve clinical outcomes of patients admitted to the hospital with severe COVID-19.

methodsWe did an open-label, randomised clinical trial at 57 centres in Brazil. We enrolled patients admitted to hospital with suspected or confirmed COVID-19 and at least one additional severity criteria as follows: use of oxygen supplementation of more than 4 L/min flow; use of high-flow nasal cannula; use of non-invasive mechanical ventilation; or use of invasive mechanical ventilation. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to azithromycin (500 mg via oral, nasogastric, or intravenous administration once daily for 10 days) plus standard of care or to standard of care without macrolides. All patients received hydroxychloroquine (400 mg twice daily for 10 days) because that was part of standard of care treatment in Brazil for patients with severe COVID-19. The primary outcome, assessed by an independent adjudication committee masked to treatment allocation, was clinical status at day 15 after randomisation, assessed by a six-point ordinal scale, with levels ranging from 1 to 6 and higher scores indicating a worse condition (with odds ratio [OR] greater than 1·00 favouring the control group). The primary outcome was assessed in all patients in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population who had severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection confirmed by molecular or serological testing before randomisation (ie, modified ITT [mITT] population). Safety was assessed in all patients according to which treatment they received, regardless of original group assignment. This trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04321278.

findings447 patients were enrolled from March 28 to May 19, 2020. COVID-19 was confirmed in 397 patients who constituted the mITT population, of whom 214 were assigned to the azithromycin group and 183 to the control group. In the mITT population, the primary endpoint was not significantly different between the azithromycin and control groups (OR 1·36 [95% CI 0·94-1·97], p=0·11). Rates of adverse events, including clinically relevant ventricular arrhythmias, resuscitated cardiac arrest, acute kidney failure, and corrected QT interval prolongation, were not significantly different between groups.

interpretationIn patients with severe COVID-19, adding azithromycin to standard of care treatment (which included hydroxychloroquine) did not improve clinical outcomes. Our findings do not support the routine use of azithromycin in combination with hydroxychloroquine in patients with severe COVID-19.

fundingCOALITION COVID-19 Brazil and EMS.

Indexed as

AgedAntiviral AgentsAzithromycinBetacoronavirusBrazilCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19Drug Therapy, CombinationFemaleHumansHydroxychloroquineLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedPandemicsPneumonia, ViralAntiviral AgentsAzithromycinHydroxychloroquine

Identifiers

PMID32896292
PMCPMC7836431
OpenAlexW3083605260

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.