Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32895781›Full record

Observational studyCardiovascular and interventional radiology2021

Comparison Between CBCT and Fusion PET/CT-CBCT Guidance for Lung Biopsies.

Federico Fontana, Filippo Piacentino, Anna Maria Ierardi, Gianpaolo Carrafiello, Andrea Coppola, Alessandra Muollo, Alessandro Beneventi, Chiara Floridi, Andrea Selenito Imperatori, Giulio Carcano and 1 more

Abstract readComparative StudyObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Cardiovascular and interventional radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Role of Fusion Imaging in Image-Guided Thermal Ablations.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Federico FontanaDiagnostic and Interventional Radiology Department, Ospedale di Circolo e Fondazione Macchi, ASST dei Sette Laghi, Via Guicciardini, 9, 21100, Varese, Italy.
Filippo PiacentinoDiagnostic and Interventional Radiology Department, Ospedale di Circolo e Fondazione Macchi, ASST dei Sette Laghi, Via Guicciardini, 9, 21100, Varese, Italy.
Anna Maria IerardiDiagnostic and Interventional Radiology Department, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, San Paolo Hospital, Milan, Italy.
Gianpaolo CarrafielloDiagnostic and Interventional Radiology Department, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, San Paolo Hospital, Milan, Italy.
Andrea CoppolaDiagnostic and Interventional Radiology Department, Ospedale di Circolo e Fondazione Macchi, ASST dei Sette Laghi, Via Guicciardini, 9, 21100, Varese, Italy. coppola.andrea.mg@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3840-6693
Alessandra MuolloRadiology Department, Ospedale di Legnano, ASST Ovest Milanese, Legnano, MI, Italy.
Alessandro BeneventiDiagnostic and Interventional Radiology Department, Ospedale Sant'Anna, ASST Lariana, Como, Italy.
Chiara FloridiUniversità Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy.
Andrea Selenito ImperatoriUniversità degli Studi dell'Insubria, Varese, Italy.
Giulio CarcanoUniversità degli Studi dell'Insubria, Varese, Italy.
Massimo VenturiniDiagnostic and Interventional Radiology Department, Ospedale di Circolo e Fondazione Macchi, ASST dei Sette Laghi, Via Guicciardini, 9, 21100, Varese, Italy.
University of Insubria · ITOspedale di Circolo e Fondazione Macchi · ITUniversity of Milan · ITAzienda Ospedaliera Ospedale Civile di Legnano · ITAzienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale Lariana · ITMarche Polytechnic University · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo establish the feasibility of performing percutaneous biopsy of lung lesions guided by fusion PET/CT-CBCT and to evaluate whether the metabolic information provided by a prior PET/CT scan add incremental benefits for diagnosis.

methodsWe retrospectively reviewed data from 180 patients who underwent CBCT-guided lung biopsy (group 1-90 cases) or PET/CT-CBCT fusion-guided lung biopsy (group 2-90 cases). Technical and clinical success was calculated. We also evaluated the agreement between biopsy and definitive histology and the possibility to carrying out immunehistochemical and molecular biology analyses.

resultsTechnical success was achieved in 84/90 (93.3%) cases for group 1 and 89/90 (98.9%) for group 2 cases (p 0.054). Clinical success was achieved in 80/94 (95.2%) cases for group 1 and 88/89 (98.9%) cases for group 2. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values and accuracy rate were, respectively, 94.5%, 100.0%, 100.0%, 73.3% and 95.2% for group 1 and 98.6%, 100.0%, 100.0%, 94.4% and 98.9% for group 2 (p 0.167). Agreement between biopsy and definitive histology was reached in 85.7% for group 1 and in 96.2% for group 2 (p 0.211). Immunohistochemical and molecular biology investigations were possible in 66.7% for group 1 and in 77.0% for group 2 (p 0.297). No major complication occurred.

conclusionsPET/CT-CBCT-guided lung biopsy is a feasible technique. In our retrospective case series, we found a higher clinical success rate, but no statistical difference was found.

Indexed as

AgedFemaleHumansImage-Guided BiopsyLungLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyRetrospective StudiesSpiral Cone-Beam Computed TomographyCBCTFusion imagingInterventional radiologyLung biopsyOncology

Identifiers

PMID32895781
OpenAlexW3084331039

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.