Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32895775›Full record

ArticleMonash bioethics review2020

Human cerebral organoids and consciousness: a double-edged sword.

Andrea Lavazza

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Monash bioethics review, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 87 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Organoids: a systematic review of ethical issues.Stem cell research & therapy · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. When to create embryos or organoids for research.Journal of medical ethics · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Animus: human-embodied animals.Journal of medical ethics · 2024
    Article
  11. Why brain organoids are not conscious yet.Patterns (New York, N.Y.) · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Cerebral Organoid Research Ethics and Pinning the Tail on the Donkey.Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics : CQ : the international journal of healthcare ethics committees · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Andrea LavazzaCentro Universitario Internazionale, Via Garbasso, 42, 52100, Arezzo, Italy. lavazza67@gmail.com.
Centro Universitario Internazionale · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human cerebral organoids (HCOs) are three-dimensional in vitro cell cultures that mimic the developmental process and organization of the developing human brain. In just a few years this technique has produced brain models that are already being used to study diseases of the nervous system and to test treatments and drugs. Currently, HCOs consist of tens of millions of cells and have a size of a few millimeters. The greatest limitation to further development is due to their lack of vascularization. However, recent research has shown that human cerebral organoids can manifest the same electrical activity and connections between brain neurons and EEG patterns as those recorded in preterm babies. All this suggests that, in the future, HCOs may manifest an ability to experience basic sensations such as pain, therefore manifesting sentience, or even rudimentary forms of consciousness. This calls for consideration of whether cerebral organoids should be given a moral status and what limitations should be introduced to regulate research. In this article I focus particularly on the study of the emergence and mechanisms of human consciousness, i.e. one of the most complex scientific problems there are, by means of experiments on HCOs. This type of experiment raises relevant ethical issues and, as I will argue, should probably not be considered morally acceptable.

Indexed as

Bioethical IssuesBrainMoral StatusOrganoidsBiotechnologyCell Culture TechniquesConsciousnessDissent and DisputesHumansChimerasIntegrated information theoryKant’s humanity formulaMoral statusPersonhood

Identifiers

PMID32895775
PMCPMC7723930
OpenAlexW3084130267

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.