Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32895429›Full record

Observational studyScientific reports2020

Retrospective comparative analysis of choledochoscopic bile duct exploration versus ERCP for bile duct stones.

Y Al-Habbal, I Reid, T Tiang, N Houli, B Lai, T McQuillan, D Bird, T Yong

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Comparing One-Stage vs Two-Stage Approaches for the Management of Choledocholithiasis.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2023
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Advances in Risk Factors for Recurrence of Common Bile Duct Stones.International journal of medical sciences · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Y Al-HabbalDepartment of HPB Surgery, The Northern Hospital, Epping, VIC, 3076, Australia. yahya@alhabbal.info.
I ReidDepartment of HPB Surgery, The Northern Hospital, Epping, VIC, 3076, Australia.
T TiangDepartment of HPB Surgery, The Northern Hospital, Epping, VIC, 3076, Australia.
N HouliDepartment of HPB Surgery, The Northern Hospital, Epping, VIC, 3076, Australia.
B LaiDepartment of HPB Surgery, The Northern Hospital, Epping, VIC, 3076, Australia.
T McQuillanDepartment of HPB Surgery, The Northern Hospital, Epping, VIC, 3076, Australia.
D BirdDepartment of HPB Surgery, The Northern Hospital, Epping, VIC, 3076, Australia.
T YongDepartment of HPB Surgery, The Northern Hospital, Epping, VIC, 3076, Australia.
Northern Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Debate still exists for the management of choledocholithiasis. The purpose of this study is to quantify the rate of recurrent choledocholithiasis post choledochoscopic bile duct exploration (CBDE) in comparison to ERCP and sphincterotomy, and to demonstrate the feasibility of this approach in a busy metropolitan hospital. Data of patients undergoing CBDE from 2009-2014 at the Northern Hospital, Victoria, Australia, was collected retrospectively. Primary outcomes were bile duct clearance rate and rate of recurrent stones post-clearance. Secondary outcomes measured were post-operative complications, laparoscopic to open conversion rate and operative time. Data of patients undergoing ERCP at the same institution was collected and compared. In total, there were 4,091 cholecystectomy cases performed from 2009-2014, of which 260 (6.3%) of patients had an intraoperative cholangiography (IOC) indicating a common bile duct (CBD) stone. Two hundred and forty-eight patients (95.3%) had a CBDE. The remaining 12 patients (4.6%) had radiological clearance, which were excluded from the study. The overall clearance rate for patients undergoing CBDE was 84% (209/248). The risk of recurrent stones up to 8 years post clearance was 2% (4/209). In the same institution, and between 1998-2012, a total of 1,148 patients underwent ERCP, of which 571 had endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES). Forty-three patients required a repeat ERCP for recurrent CBD stones with a complication rate of 7.5%. Time to recurrence ranged from 6 months to 10 years with a mean of 4.5 years. The rate of recurrence was lower in the CBDE group compared to the patients who had an ERCP (8.9% vs. 2%). CBDE is a feasible and effective method for clearance of CBD stones at the time of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. This approach, although not widely used, reduces the need for ERCP, which has inherent complications. In the longer term, this series showed a significant reduction in the rate of CBD stone recurrence.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCatheterizationCholangiographyCholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic RetrogradeCholecystectomy, LaparoscopicCholedocholithiasisCommon Bile DuctFemaleGallstonesHumansIntraoperative CareLength of StayMale

Identifiers

PMID32895429
PMCPMC7476925
OpenAlexW3083458886

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.