Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32895398›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Development of a fast and user-friendly cryopreservation protocol for sweet potato genetic resources.

Hannes Wilms, Natalia Fanega Sleziak, Maarten Van der Auweraer, Martijn Brands, Matthijs Verleije, Dirk Hardeman, Edwige Andre, Bart Panis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Hannes WilmsDept. Biosystems, Laboratory of Tropical Crop Improvement, KU Leuven, 3001, Leuven, Belgium. hannes.wilms@kuleuven.be.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8671-3447
Natalia Fanega SleziakBioversity International, Belgian Office at KU Leuven, 3001, Leuven, Belgium.
Maarten Van der AuweraerDept. Biosystems, Laboratory of Tropical Crop Improvement, KU Leuven, 3001, Leuven, Belgium.
Martijn BrandsDept. Biosystems, Laboratory of Tropical Crop Improvement, KU Leuven, 3001, Leuven, Belgium.
Matthijs VerleijeDept. Biosystems, Laboratory of Tropical Crop Improvement, KU Leuven, 3001, Leuven, Belgium.
Dirk HardemanDept. Biosystems, Laboratory of Tropical Crop Improvement, KU Leuven, 3001, Leuven, Belgium.
Edwige AndreDept. Biosystems, Laboratory of Tropical Crop Improvement, KU Leuven, 3001, Leuven, Belgium.
Bart PanisDept. Biosystems, Laboratory of Tropical Crop Improvement, KU Leuven, 3001, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6717-947X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas) is one of the ten most important staple crops and provides a livelihood for many people around the globe. To adapt to ever-changing circumstances farmers and breeders need to have access to a broad diversity of germplasm. This study focuses on the development of a cryopreservation protocol that allows the long term storage of different sweet potato cultivars. For this, a droplet vitrification protocol was optimized, comparing several parameters; preculture method (0.3 M sucrose vs no preculture); meristem position (axillary vs apical); plant age (3 to 9 weeks); regeneration medium (MS + 2.22 µM BA, Hirai and MS); and length of loading solution treatment (20 to 360 min). Two months after cryopreservation, the regeneration rates of the meristems were compared, which resulted in significant differences for the preculture method, meristem position and loading solution. With these new insights an optimized droplet vitrification protocol was developed with the following parameters: use of 3-9 week old axillary meristems, no preculture phase, 20 min LS treatment, 30 min PVS2 treatment, exposure to liquid nitrogen by droplet vitrification, warming treatment in RS for 15 min, 1 day 0.3 M sucrose recuperation culture, 1 month MS + 2.22 µM BA followed by 1 month of MS cultures. This protocol was subsequently tested on 10 representative accessions resulting in a post cryopreservation regeneration rate of more than 40% for 70% of the tested cultivars, showing that this protocol could be implemented for a large portion of existing sweet potato collections.

Indexed as

VitrificationCryopreservationCryoprotective AgentsIpomoea batatasMeristemTime FactorsCryoprotective Agents

Identifiers

PMID32895398
PMCPMC7477159

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.