Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32895382›Full record

ArticleNature communications2020

Population sequencing enhances understanding of tea plant evolution.

Xinchao Wang, Hu Feng, Yuxiao Chang, Chunlei Ma, Liyuan Wang, Xinyuan Hao, A'lun Li, Hao Cheng, Lu Wang, Peng Cui and 12 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 124 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
124citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

124 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Comparative Genomics of the TeaInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. ddRAD sequencing of 1076Plant diversity · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The Bra1K array: an efficient and versatile 1K liquid-phase SNP chip for genetics and breeding in Chinese cabbage.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

64 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Xinchao Wang *Key Laboratory of Tea Biology and Resource Utilization, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, National Center for Tea Plant Improvement, Tea Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 310008, Hangzhou, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5224-6286
Hu Feng *Lingnan Guangdong Laboratory of Modern Agriculture, Genome Analysis Laboratory of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 518120, Shenzhen, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0865-0206
Yuxiao Chang *Lingnan Guangdong Laboratory of Modern Agriculture, Genome Analysis Laboratory of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 518120, Shenzhen, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0703-3732
Chunlei Ma *Key Laboratory of Tea Biology and Resource Utilization, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, National Center for Tea Plant Improvement, Tea Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 310008, Hangzhou, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5171-7672
Liyuan Wang *Key Laboratory of Tea Biology and Resource Utilization, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, National Center for Tea Plant Improvement, Tea Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 310008, Hangzhou, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1605-9192
Xinyuan Hao *Key Laboratory of Tea Biology and Resource Utilization, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, National Center for Tea Plant Improvement, Tea Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 310008, Hangzhou, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8300-7491
A'lun LiLingnan Guangdong Laboratory of Modern Agriculture, Genome Analysis Laboratory of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 518120, Shenzhen, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2056-0833
Hao ChengKey Laboratory of Tea Biology and Resource Utilization, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, National Center for Tea Plant Improvement, Tea Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 310008, Hangzhou, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9597-7313
Lu WangKey Laboratory of Tea Biology and Resource Utilization, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, National Center for Tea Plant Improvement, Tea Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 310008, Hangzhou, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9303-4482
Peng CuiLingnan Guangdong Laboratory of Modern Agriculture, Genome Analysis Laboratory of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 518120, Shenzhen, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2989-571X
Jiqiang JinKey Laboratory of Tea Biology and Resource Utilization, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, National Center for Tea Plant Improvement, Tea Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 310008, Hangzhou, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1627-480X
Xiaobo WangLingnan Guangdong Laboratory of Modern Agriculture, Genome Analysis Laboratory of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 518120, Shenzhen, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6754-7404
Kang WeiKey Laboratory of Tea Biology and Resource Utilization, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, National Center for Tea Plant Improvement, Tea Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 310008, Hangzhou, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7517-7201
Cheng AiLingnan Guangdong Laboratory of Modern Agriculture, Genome Analysis Laboratory of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 518120, Shenzhen, China.
Sheng ZhaoLingnan Guangdong Laboratory of Modern Agriculture, Genome Analysis Laboratory of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 518120, Shenzhen, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2296-0603
Zhichao WuLingnan Guangdong Laboratory of Modern Agriculture, Genome Analysis Laboratory of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 518120, Shenzhen, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3006-043X
Youyong LiTea Research Institute, Yunnan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 650231, Menghai, China.
Benying LiuTea Research Institute, Yunnan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 650231, Menghai, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9241-4240
Guo-Dong WangState Key Laboratory of Genetic Resources and Evolution, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 650223, Kunming, China. wanggd@mail.kiz.ac.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9407-4363
Liang ChenKey Laboratory of Tea Biology and Resource Utilization, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, National Center for Tea Plant Improvement, Tea Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 310008, Hangzhou, China. liangchen@tricaas.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7507-3947
Jue RuanLingnan Guangdong Laboratory of Modern Agriculture, Genome Analysis Laboratory of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 518120, Shenzhen, China. ruanjue@caas.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3713-3192
Yajun YangKey Laboratory of Tea Biology and Resource Utilization, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, National Center for Tea Plant Improvement, Tea Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 310008, Hangzhou, China. yjyang@tricaas.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0552-5730

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tea is an economically important plant characterized by a large genome, high heterozygosity, and high species diversity. In this study, we assemble a 3.26-Gb high-quality chromosome-scale genome for the 'Longjing 43' cultivar of Camellia sinensis var. sinensis. Genomic resequencing of 139 tea accessions from around the world is used to investigate the evolution and phylogenetic relationships of tea accessions. We find that hybridization has increased the heterozygosity and wide-ranging gene flow among tea populations with the spread of tea cultivation. Population genetic and transcriptomic analyses reveal that during domestication, selection for disease resistance and flavor in C. sinensis var. sinensis populations has been stronger than that in C. sinensis var. assamica populations. This study provides resources for marker-assisted breeding of tea and sets the foundation for further research on tea genetics and evolution.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularPlant BreedingCamellia sinensisDisease ResistanceDomesticationGene Expression ProfilingGenome, PlantGenomicsPhylogenyPolymorphism, Single Nucleotide

Identifiers

PMID32895382
PMCPMC7477583

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.