Trial reportGut2021
Equivalent performance of single-use and reusable duodenoscopes in a randomised trial.
Trial report in Gut, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04143698 (Randomized Trial Comparing Reusable and Disposable Duodenoscopes for ERCP), which is not on this map. Cited by 30 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Randomized Trial Comparing Reusable and Disposable Duodenoscopes for ERCP
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 79 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy of double-balloon enteroscopy-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for hepaticojejunostomy strictures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Pooled it
- Diagnostic and Clinical Performance of Single-Use Versus Reusable Gastrointestinal Endoscopes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses.Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2026Pooled it
- [A systematic analysis of nosocomial outbreaks of nosocomial infections after gastrointestinal endoscopy].Zeitschrift fur Gastroenterologie · 2023Pooled it
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy-Associated Infections: Update on an Emerging Issue.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2022Pooled it
- Technical and clinical feasibility of single-use gastroscopy with real-time AI-based quality monitoring and single-use colonoscopy: a prospective two-center study.Biomedical engineering online · 2026Trial
- Trial
- Disposable Colonoscopes: Unpacking the Infection-Free Endoscopy With the REAL Price Tag-What About Performance?Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society · 2025Article
- Evaluation and application of an innovative portable field endoscope: addressing battlefield and biosafety concerns.Military Medical Research · 2025Article
- Comparison of a portable disposable large-channel gastroscope and a conventional reusable gastroscope in gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2025Article
- Efficacy and safety of single use duodenoscopes in comparison to reusable duodenoscopes for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: A single center experience.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2025Article
- The evolution of single-use duodenoscope utilization at a large-volume endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography tertiary care center.iGIE : innovation, investigation and insights · 2025Article
- Urgent ERCP performed with single-use duodenoscope (SUD) in patients with moderate-to-severe cholangitis: Single-center prospective study.Endoscopy international open · 2024Article
- Current Status and Future Course of Disposable-Component and Single-Use Duodenoscopes.Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2023Article
- Single-use duodenoscopes compared with reusable duodenoscopes in patients carrying multidrug-resistant microorganisms: a break-even cost analysis.Endoscopy international open · 2023Article
- Transmission of oral microbiota to the biliary tract during endoscopic retrograde cholangiography.BMC gastroenterology · 2023Article
- Performance of single-use duodenoscopes for ERCP: a systematic review and meta-analysis.iGIE : innovation, investigation and insights · 2022Article
- Are single-use scopes the way of the future?iGIE : innovation, investigation and insights · 2022Review
- Single-use duodenoscopes are an efficient tool for emergency ERCP in real life.Endoscopy international open · 2022Article
- Single-use duodenoscopes for the prevention of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography -related cross-infection - from bench studies to clinical evidence.World journal of methodology · 2022Article
- Single-Use Duodenoscopes for ERCP: Rationale, Feasibility, Cost, and Environmental Impact.Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveSingle-use duodenoscopes have been recently developed to eliminate risk of infection transmission from contaminated reusable duodenoscopes. We compared performances of single-use and reusable duodenoscopes in patients undergoing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP).
designPatients with native papilla requiring ERCP were randomised to single-use or reusable duodenoscope. Primary outcome was comparing number of attempts to achieve successful cannulation of desired duct. Secondary outcomes were technical performance that measured duodenoscope manoeuvrability, mechanical-imaging characteristics and ability to perform therapeutic interventions, need for advanced cannulation techniques or cross-over to alternate duodenoscope group to achieve ductal access and adverse events.
results98 patients were treated using single-use (n=48) or reusable (n=50) duodenoscopes with >80% graded as low-complexity procedures. While median number of attempts to achieve successful cannulation was significantly lower for single-use cohort (2 vs 5, p=0.013), ease of passage into stomach (p=0.047), image quality (p<0.001), image stability (p<0.001) and air-water button functionality (p<0.001) were significantly worse. There was no significant difference in rate of cannulation, adverse events including mortality (one patient in each group), need to cross-over or need for advanced cannulation techniques to achieve ductal access, between cohorts. On multivariate logistic regression analysis, only duodenoscope type (single-use) was associated with less than six attempts to achieve selective cannulation (p=0.012), when adjusted for patient demographics, procedural complexity and type of intervention.
conclusionGiven the overall safety profile and similar technical performance, single-use duodenoscopes represent an alternative to reusable duodenoscopes for performing low-complexity ERCP procedures in experienced hands. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Clinicaltrials.gov number: NCT04143698.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.