Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32895283›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2020

Experiencing the risk of overutilising opioids among patients with chronic non-cancer pain in ambulatory care (ERONA): the protocol of an exploratory, randomised controlled trial.

Odette Wegwarth, Claudia Spies, Erika Schulte, Joerg J Meerpohl, Christine Schmucker, Edris Nury, Dirk Brockmann, Norbert Donner-Banzhoff, Stefan Wind, Eva Goebel and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Odette WegwarthCenter for Adaptive Rationality, Max-Planck-Institut für Bildungsforschung, Berlin, Germany wegwarth@mpib-berlin.mpg.de.ORCID 0000-0003-0885-2673
Claudia SpiesDepartment of Anesthesiology and Operative Intensive Care Medicine, Charité, Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Erika SchulteDepartment of Anesthesiology and Operative Intensive Care Medicine, Charité, Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Joerg J MeerpohlInstitute for Evidence in Medicine (for Cochrane Germany Foundation), Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Christine SchmuckerInstitute for Evidence in Medicine (for Cochrane Germany Foundation), Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Edris NuryInstitute for Evidence in Medicine (for Cochrane Germany Foundation), Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Dirk BrockmannInstitute for Theoretical Biology and Integrative Research, Humboldt University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Norbert Donner-BanzhoffDepartment of Primary Care, University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Stefan WindBerlin Chamber of Pharmacists, Berlin, Germany.
Eva GoebelBerlin Chamber of Pharmacists, Berlin, Germany.
Wolf-Dieter LudwigDrug Commission of the German Medical Association, Berlin, Germany.
Ralph HertwigCenter for Adaptive Rationality, Max-Planck-Institut für Bildungsforschung, Berlin, Germany.
University of Freiburg · DECharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEFederal Union of German Associations of Pharmacists · DEMax Planck Institute for Human Development · DEGerman Medical Association · DEPhilipps University of Marburg · DERobert Koch Institute · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe US opioid crisis and increasing prescription rates in Europe suggest inappropriate risk perceptions and behaviours of people who prescribe, take or advise on opioids: physicians, patients and pharmacists. Findings from cognitive and decision science in areas other than drug safety suggest that people's risk perception and behaviour can differ depending on whether they learnt about a risk through personal experience or description. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: ERONA-an exploratory, randomised controlled online survey intervention trial with two parallel arms-will examine the opioid-associated risk perception and behaviour of four groups involved in the long-term administration of WHO-III opioids: (1) family physicians, (2) physicians specialised in pain therapy, (3) patients with chronic (≥3 months) non-cancer pain and (4) pharmacists who regularly dispense narcotic substances. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two online risk education interventions, description based or experiencebased. Both interventions will present the best medical evidence available. Participants will be queried at baseline and after intervention on their risk perception of opioids' benefit-harm ratio, their medical risk literacy and their current/intended risk behaviour (in terms of prescribing, taking or counselling, depending on study group). A follow-up will occur after 9 months, when participants will be queried on their actual risk behaviour. The study was developed by the authors and will be conducted by the market research institution IPSOS Health. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Max Planck Institute for Human Development. Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals, conference presentations and social media. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: DRKS00020358.

Indexed as

Chronic PainPhysiciansAmbulatory CareAnalgesics, OpioidEuropeHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAnalgesics, Opioidhealth & safetymedical education & trainingpain managementpublic healthrisk management

Identifiers

PMID32895283
PMCPMC7476567
OpenAlexW3048179238

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.