Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32895268›Full record

SynthesisBMJ open2020

Medication-related experiences of patients with polypharmacy: a systematic review of qualitative studies.

Christian Ulrich Eriksen, Stavros Kyriakidis, Line Due Christensen, Ramune Jacobsen, Jannie Laursen, Mikkel Bring Christensen, Anne Frølich

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Systemic disseminated zoonotic sporotrichosis with multifocal bone involvement: A case report.Malaysian family physician : the official journal of the Academy of Family Physicians of Malaysia · 2025
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Association of Healthy Lifestyle and Incident Polypharmacy.The American journal of medicine · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Christian Ulrich EriksenCenter for Clinical Research and Prevention, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, Capital Region of Denmark, Frederiksberg, Denmark cueriksen@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-7163-5703
Stavros KyriakidisCenter for Clinical Research and Prevention, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, Capital Region of Denmark, Frederiksberg, Denmark.
Line Due ChristensenThe Research Unit for General Practice, Aarhus, Denmark.
Ramune JacobsenResearch Group for Social and Clinical Pharmacy, Department of Pharmacy, University of Copenhagen, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Jannie LaursenGlobal Business Quality Management, Falck, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Mikkel Bring Christensen *Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Anne Frølich *The Research Unit for General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Copenhagen, Denmark.
University of Copenhagen · DKFrederiksberg Hospital · DKAarhus University · DKQuality of Life Research Center · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe aimed to synthesise qualitative studies exploring medication-related experiences of polypharmacy among patients with multimorbidity.

methodsWe systematically searched PubMed, Embase and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature in February 2020 for primary, peer-reviewed qualitative studies about multimorbid patients' medication-related experiences with polypharmacy, defined as the use of four or more medications. Identified studies were appraised for methodological quality by applying the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme checklist for qualitative research, and data were extracted and synthesised by the meta-aggregation approach.

resultsWe included 13 qualitative studies, representing 499 patients with polypharmacy and a wide range of chronic conditions. Overall, most Critical Appraisal Skills Programme items were reported in the studies. We extracted 140 findings, synthesised these into 17 categories, and developed five interrelated syntheses: (1) patients with polypharmacy are a heterogeneous group in terms of needing and appraising medication information; (2) patients are aware of the importance of medication adherence, but it is difficult to achieve; (3) decision-making about medications is complex; (4) multiple relational factors affect communication between patients and physicians, and these factors can prevent patients from disclosing important information; and (5) polypharmacy affects patients' lives and self-perception, and challenges with polypharmacy are not limited to practical issues of medication-taking. DISCUSSION: Polypharmacy poses many challenges to patients, which have a negative impact on quality of life and adherence. Thus, when dealing with polypharmacy patients, it is crucial that healthcare professionals actively solicit individual patients' perspectives on challenges related to polypharmacy. Based on the reported experiences, we recommend that healthcare professionals upscale communicative efforts and involve patients' social network on an individualised basis to facilitate shared decision-making and treatment adherence in multimorbidpatients with polypharmacy.

Indexed as

PolypharmacyQuality of LifeHealth PersonnelHumansMedication AdherenceQualitative Researchclinical pharmacologyqualitative researchquality in health care

Identifiers

PMID32895268
PMCPMC7477975
OpenAlexW3083383399

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.