ArticleBMJ open2020
Cryoablation for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a protocol for a systematic review.
Article in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cryoablation for airway stenosis caused by malignant pulmonary epithelioid hemangioendothelioma: a case report.AME case reports · 2025Article
- Large apical lung cancer treated with CT-guided percutaneous cryoablation.Radiology case reports · 2024Article
- Global research trends and hotspots on smoking and lung cancer from 1994-2023: A bibliometric analysis.Tobacco induced diseases · 2024Article
- Image-guided percutaneous ablation for lung malignancies.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Review
- Prognostic Value of UBE2T and Its Correlation with Immune Infiltrates in Lung Adenocarcinoma.Journal of oncology · 2022Article
- Cryoablation and immune synergistic effect for lung cancer: A review.Frontiers in immunology · 2022Review
- Argon-Helium Cryoablation for Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma in the Elderly.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionNational Comprehensive Cancer Network has recommended cryoablation to replace the resection in the treatment of medically operable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Cryoablation also has been used for the advanced NSCLC in randomised controlled trials. However, they have not been systematically reviewed. Here, we provide a protocol to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of cryoablation in the treatment of advanced NSCLC. METHODS AND ANALYSES: We will search PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Chinese Biomedical Database, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Database and Chinese Scientific Journal Database without language restrictions from inception until 1 February 2020. Trial registers (International Clinical Trials Registry platform, the US National Institutes of Health Ongoing Trials Register and the ISRCTN registry) and reference lists of retrieved articles will also be searched. Two reviewers will independently extract data on participants, interventions, comparisons, outcomes and assess the methodological quality by the Cochrane risk of bias tool. The strength of evidences will be evaluated according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach. Review Manager V.5.3 software will be used for data analyses. Meta-analyses will be performed if the data are sufficiently homogeneous. The primary outcomes will be objective response rate and overall survival. The secondary outcomes will be adverse effects, health-related quality of life, changes of immune indicators and surrogate outcomes (disease control rate, progression-free survival and survival rate). ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval is not required, as this study will not involve patients. The results of this study will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal for publication, to inform both clinical practice and further research. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42019138660.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.