Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32895024›Full record

ArticleTrends in hearing

Spectrotemporal Modulation Sensitivity in Cochlear-Implant and Normal-Hearing Listeners: Is the Performance Driven by Temporal or Spectral Modulation Sensitivity?

Ning Zhou, Susannah Dixon, Zhen Zhu, Lixue Dong, Marti Weiner

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Trends in hearing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ning ZhouDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-9521-679X
Susannah DixonDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina, United States.
Zhen ZhuDepartment of Engineering, East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina, United States.
Lixue DongDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina, United States.
Marti WeinerDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina, United States.
East Carolina University · US

Funding

Using Psychophysical Methods to Understand and Improve Speech Recognition in Cochlear Implant UsersR01DC017702 · NIDCD · EAST CAROLINA UNIVERSITY · PI ZHU, ZHEN · 2019 to 2022
$1.5M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC017702
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study examined the contribution of temporal and spectral modulation sensitivity to discrimination of stimuli modulated in both the time and frequency domains. The spectrotemporally modulated stimuli contained spectral ripples that shifted systematically across frequency over time at a repetition rate of 5 Hz. As the ripple density increased in the stimulus, modulation depth of the 5 Hz amplitude modulation (AM) reduced. Spectrotemporal modulation discrimination was compared with subjects' ability to discriminate static spectral ripples and the ability to detect slow AM. The general pattern from both the cochlear implant (CI) and normal hearing groups showed that spectrotemporal modulation thresholds were correlated more strongly with AM detection than with static ripple discrimination. CI subjects' spectrotemporal modulation thresholds were also highly correlated with speech recognition in noise, when partialing out static ripple discrimination, but the correlation was not significant when partialing out AM detection. The results indicated that temporal information was more heavily weighted in spectrotemporal modulation discrimination, and for CI subjects, it was AM sensitivity that drove the correlation between spectrotemporal modulation thresholds and speech recognition. The results suggest that for the rates tested here, temporal information processing may limit performance more than spectral information processing in both CI users and normal hearing listeners.

Indexed as

Cochlear ImplantationCochlear ImplantsSpeech PerceptionHumansNoiseSpeechamplitude modulation detectionspectral ripple discriminationspectrotemporal modulation

Identifiers

PMID32895024
PMCPMC7482033
OpenAlexW3084127304

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.