Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32894450›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics2021

Differences in Intestinal Metabolism of Ginseng Between Normal and Immunosuppressed Rats.

Jin-Hao Zhu, Jin-Di Xu, Shan-Shan Zhou, Xiao-Ya Zhang, Jing Zhou, Ming Kong, Qian Mao, He Zhu, Song-Lin Li

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Network analysis andFrontiers in pharmacology · 2025
    Article
  4. Current View on How Human Gut Microbiota Mediate Metabolic and Pharmacological Activity ofEndocrine, metabolic & immune disorders drug targets · 2024
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Frontiers in chemistry · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jin-Hao ZhuDepartment of Pharmaceutical Analysis, Affiliated Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, 210028, People's Republic of China.
Jin-Di XuDepartment of Pharmaceutical Analysis, Affiliated Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, 210028, People's Republic of China.
Shan-Shan ZhouDepartment of Metabolomics, Jiangsu Province Academy of Traditional Chinese Medicine and Jiangsu Branch of China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Nanjing, 210028, People's Republic of China.
Xiao-Ya ZhangDepartment of Pharmaceutical Analysis, Affiliated Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, 210028, People's Republic of China.
Jing ZhouDepartment of Metabolomics, Jiangsu Province Academy of Traditional Chinese Medicine and Jiangsu Branch of China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Nanjing, 210028, People's Republic of China.
Ming KongDepartment of Metabolomics, Jiangsu Province Academy of Traditional Chinese Medicine and Jiangsu Branch of China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Nanjing, 210028, People's Republic of China.
Qian MaoDepartment of Metabolomics, Jiangsu Province Academy of Traditional Chinese Medicine and Jiangsu Branch of China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Nanjing, 210028, People's Republic of China.
He ZhuDepartment of Metabolomics, Jiangsu Province Academy of Traditional Chinese Medicine and Jiangsu Branch of China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Nanjing, 210028, People's Republic of China. zhuhev@163.com.
Song-Lin LiDepartment of Pharmaceutical Analysis, Affiliated Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, 210028, People's Republic of China. songlinli64@126.com.
Jiangsu Provincial Academy of Traditional Chinese Medicine · CNNanjing University of Chinese Medicine · CNChina Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences · CN

Funding

Independent Research Projects of Jiangsu Province Academy of Traditional Chinese Medicine BM2018024-2019001Independent Research Projects of Jiangsu Province Academy of Traditional Chinese Medicine BM2018024-2019009National Key R&D Program of China 2019YFC1711000National Natural Science Foundation of China 81503365National Natural Science Foundation of China 81873094Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province, China BK20191504
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectiveGinseng is usually consumed as a dietary supplement for health care in the normal state or prescribed as a herbal medicine in pathologic conditions. Although metabolic studies of ginseng are commonly performed on healthy organisms, the metabolic characteristics in pathologic organisms remain unexplored. This study aimed to uncover the difference in intestinal metabolism of ginseng between normal and cyclophosphamide-induced immunosuppressed rats and further discuss the potential mechanisms involved.

methodsTwelve Sprague-Dawley rats (6-8 weeks old) were randomly divided into two groups: the normal group (NG) and immunosuppressed group (ISG). Rats in the NG and ISG groups were intraperitoneally administered normal saline and cyclophosphamide injections (40 mg/kg) on the 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 10th days; on the 12th day, all rats were intragastrically administered ginseng water extract (900 mg/kg). The difference in intestinal metabolism of ginseng was compared using an ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography coupled with quadruple time-of-flight mass spectrometry-based metabolomics approach, and the diversities of gut microbiota were analyzed by 16S rRNA gene sequencing between the two groups.

resultsThe intestinal metabolomic characteristics of ginseng were significantly different between the normal and immunosuppressed rats, with the ginsenoside F

conclusionThe intestinal metabolism of ginseng in immunosuppressed rats was significantly different from that in normal ones, which might be partly attributed to the changes in the intensity of specific gut bacteria. The outcomes of this study could provide scientific data for rationalization of ginseng use as both a dietary supplement and herbal medicine.

Indexed as

PanaxAnimalsCyclophosphamideGastrointestinal MicrobiomeGinsenosidesImmune ToleranceImmunosuppressive AgentsIntestinal MucosaMalePlant ExtractsRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyCyclophosphamideGinsenosidesImmunosuppressive AgentsPlant Extracts

Identifiers

PMID32894450
OpenAlexW3083838086

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.