Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32894417›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry2021

What is trending in paediatric dentistry? An Altmetric study on paediatric dentistry journals.

M Adobes Martin, A Zhou Wu, L Marques Martínez, A M Gonzalvez Moreno, R Aiuto, D Garcovich

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. The correlation between altmetric score and traditional measures of article impact for studies pertaining to spine trauma.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2024
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

M Adobes MartinMaster in Orthodontics, Universidad Europea de Valencia, Paseo de la Alameda 7, 46010, Valencia, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9155-3844
A Zhou WuMaster in Orthodontics, Universidad Europea de Valencia, Paseo de la Alameda 7, 46010, Valencia, Spain.
L Marques MartínezDepartment of Paediatric Dentistry, Cardenal Herrera-CEU University of Moncada, Valencia, Spain.
A M Gonzalvez MorenoDepartment of Dentistry, Universidad Europea de Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
R AiutoDepartment of Oral Rehabilitation, Istituto Stomatologico Italiano, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
D GarcovichMaster in Orthodontics, Universidad Europea de Valencia, Paseo de la Alameda 7, 46010, Valencia, Spain. daniele.garcovich@universidadeuropea.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8516-8352

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo assess the online attention to research in the field of paediatric dentistry in relation to publication details and citations.

methodsThe articles were identified by a search performed through the Dimensions Free App. The search included the six journals related to paediatric dentistry listed in the SCImago Journal and Country Rank. The 200 articles with the highest AAS (Altmetric Attention Score) were collected and screened for data related to publication, authorship, and research topic. Citations were harvested from WOS (Web of Science) and Scopus.

resultsThe 86.3% of the 200 articles belonged to only two of the journals: the International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry and the European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry. The 53.5% of the articles were published between 2014 and 2019. The mean AAS was 8.3. Cross-sectional studies were the most prevalent study design. AAS did not correlate to the number of citations as reported in WOS and Scopus.

conclusionsOnline attention to research in paediatric dentistry can be improved. According to the topic, erosion studies displayed high visibility. The classic citation count in combination with the AAS offers a more comprehensive insight iinto research. The online profile of journals and their social media dissemination policies should be improved to facilitate the spread of research information in scholar and non-scholar audiences through the web.

Indexed as

Pediatric DentistryPeriodicals as TopicBibliometricsChildCross-Sectional StudiesHumansJournal Impact FactorAltmetricBibliometricsCitation analysisPaediatric dentistry

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.