ReviewStem cell reviews and reports2020
Regulatory Role of Quiescence in the Biological Function of Cancer Stem Cells.
Review in Stem cell reviews and reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
34 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cancer Stem Cell Quiescence: Molecular and Microenvironmental Evidence for an Actively Regulated Adaptive Survival Strategy.Cancer medicine · 2026Review
- Glycolytic enolase 1-induced H4K12 lactylation activates quiescent breast cancer stem-like cells in triple-negative breast cancer.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2026Article
- Decoding notch signaling pathway: an updated insight into its role in colorectal cancer progression and therapy.Cancer cell international · 2026Review
- Mechanical Stimuli-Induced Manipulation of Malignant Behavior in Bioprinted Cancer Microtissues via PI3K/NF-κB Activation.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- A phenotype-based cell culture model of melanoma cells that persist as residual disease after therapies leading to recurrence.Research square · 2026Article
- Dynamic sensor selection for biomarker discovery.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- CDK8/19 inhibition attenuates G1 arrest induced by BCR-ABL antagonists and accelerates death of chronic myelogenous leukemia cells.Cell death discovery · 2025Article
- Impact of G1 phase kinetics on the acquisition of stemness in cancer cells: the critical role of cyclin D.Molecular biology reports · 2025Review
- Review
- Article
- Microfluidic Applications in Prostate Cancer Research.Micromachines · 2024Review
- Mechanistic insights into medulloblastoma relapse.Pharmacology & therapeutics · 2024Review
- Hallmarks of cancer resistance.iScience · 2024Review
- A negative feedback loop underlies the Warburg effect.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2024Article
- Identification of genes with oscillatory expression in glioblastoma: the paradigm of SOX2.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Short-chain fatty acids induced lung tumor cell death and increased peripheral blood CD4+ T cells in NSCLC and control patients ex vivo.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Article
- Cancer cell cycle heterogeneity as a critical determinant of therapeutic resistance.Genes & diseases · 2024Review
- The role of metabolism in cellular quiescence.Journal of cell science · 2023Review
- Review
- Long non-coding RNAs in breast cancer stem cells.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Quiescence in cancer cells is considered a therapeutic challenge as it confers dormancy in tumour, hence circumventing inherent anti-neoplastic surveillance system and standard-of-care cancer therapeutics including chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Since majority of the therapeutics target actively proliferating cancer cells, cancer cells eventually develop quiescent nature as mechanism of survival and cancer progression under both niche and therapeutic pressures. Quiescence state in cancer cells, eventually, confers resistant and aggressive nature to conventional cancer therapies, resulting in disease progression and relapse. Therefore, targeting quiescent cancer cells or cancer stem cells is a promising therapeutic approach, however an extensive review of the relevant information is needed in order to device an effective therapy. While the evidence of quiescence regulation in CSCs is rather a complex molecular and cellular network, herein, we aim to provide a comprehensive understanding of both intrinsic and extrinsic regulation in association with the function of CSCs. Findings on induction of quiescent state in CSCs population, its regulation at both cellular and molecular level, key molecular regulators, cellular events and processes including potential targets to develop therapeutics are extensively reviewed. This review also highlights the impact of CSC plasticity on quiescence which capturing the key challenge of targeting the cells in this state. Beyond understanding the mechanisms underlying quiescence nature of cancer cells, this review provides insightful perspective and future direction on insight in targeting these populations, hence collapse the tumour dormancy programme in order to eradicate tumour mass as a whole. Capability of CSCs to establish quiescent state as a mechanism of survival during unfavorable conditions, as well as its impact in cancer progression and subsequent relapse, including the potential therapeutic strategy to eradicate this CSCs sub-population in the tumor mass as an effective cancer therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.