Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32894403›Full record

ReviewStem cell reviews and reports2020

Regulatory Role of Quiescence in the Biological Function of Cancer Stem Cells.

Sau Har Lee, Tamika Reed-Newman, Shrikant Anant, Thamil Selvee Ramasamy

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Stem cell reviews and reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Dynamic sensor selection for biomarker discovery.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Mechanistic insights into medulloblastoma relapse.Pharmacology & therapeutics · 2024
    Review
  13. Review
  14. A negative feedback loop underlies the Warburg effect.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. The role of metabolism in cellular quiescence.Journal of cell science · 2023
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Long non-coding RNAs in breast cancer stem cells.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Sau Har LeeStem Cell Biology Laboratory, Department of Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Tamika Reed-NewmanDepartment of Cancer Biology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA.
Shrikant AnantDepartment of Cancer Biology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA.
Thamil Selvee RamasamyStem Cell Biology Laboratory, Department of Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. selvee@ummc.edu.my.ORCID 0000-0003-1720-3907
The University of Kansas Cancer Center · USUniversity Malaya Medical Centre · MYUniversity of Malaya · MY

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Quiescence in cancer cells is considered a therapeutic challenge as it confers dormancy in tumour, hence circumventing inherent anti-neoplastic surveillance system and standard-of-care cancer therapeutics including chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Since majority of the therapeutics target actively proliferating cancer cells, cancer cells eventually develop quiescent nature as mechanism of survival and cancer progression under both niche and therapeutic pressures. Quiescence state in cancer cells, eventually, confers resistant and aggressive nature to conventional cancer therapies, resulting in disease progression and relapse. Therefore, targeting quiescent cancer cells or cancer stem cells is a promising therapeutic approach, however an extensive review of the relevant information is needed in order to device an effective therapy. While the evidence of quiescence regulation in CSCs is rather a complex molecular and cellular network, herein, we aim to provide a comprehensive understanding of both intrinsic and extrinsic regulation in association with the function of CSCs. Findings on induction of quiescent state in CSCs population, its regulation at both cellular and molecular level, key molecular regulators, cellular events and processes including potential targets to develop therapeutics are extensively reviewed. This review also highlights the impact of CSC plasticity on quiescence which capturing the key challenge of targeting the cells in this state. Beyond understanding the mechanisms underlying quiescence nature of cancer cells, this review provides insightful perspective and future direction on insight in targeting these populations, hence collapse the tumour dormancy programme in order to eradicate tumour mass as a whole. Capability of CSCs to establish quiescent state as a mechanism of survival during unfavorable conditions, as well as its impact in cancer progression and subsequent relapse, including the potential therapeutic strategy to eradicate this CSCs sub-population in the tumor mass as an effective cancer therapy.

Indexed as

Cell CycleAnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsHumansNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasmsNeoplastic Stem CellsTumor MicroenvironmentAntineoplastic AgentsCancer progressionCancer stem cells (CSCs)Cellular plasticityQuiescenceSurvivalTumour dormancyTumour relapse

Identifiers

PMID32894403
OpenAlexW3084435922

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.