ArticleEnvironmental monitoring and assessment2020
Risks of graphene nanomaterial contamination in the soil: evaluation of major ions.
Article in Environmental monitoring and assessment, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Zinc speciation promotes distinct effects on dinoflagellate growth and coral trypsin-like enzyme activity.Biometals : an international journal on the role of metal ions in biology, biochemistry, and medicine · 2025Article
- Review
- Correlation of Elemental Transfer, Bioactive Compounds and Antioxidant Activity onMetabolites · 2023Article
- Toxicological assessment of pristine and degraded forms of graphene functionalized with MnOx nanoparticles using human in vitro models representing different exposure routes.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- The Effects of Graphene-Family Nanomaterials on Plant Growth: A Review.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Soils are facing new environmental contaminants, such as nanomaterials. While these emerging contaminants are increasingly being released into soil, their potential impact on this medium and their effect on soil's major chemical components (e.g., sulfate, nitrate, ammonia, and phosphate) have yet to be examined, as well as their relation with microbial toxicity. Herein, column experiments were conducted to investigate the behavior of major ions under 10 and 200 mg/L multiple contaminations of graphene nanomaterials in agricultural and undisturbed soils, as well as the retention of the graphene nanomaterials in the soil and their effect on soil zeta potentials throughout the column. Moreover, to evaluate the impact of the risks of graphene nanomaterial contamination on soil major ions, the present study also examines the bacterial toxicity. The results showed that graphene retention was influenced the soil zeta potentials. Graphene also influenced the concentrations of the major ions in soil and the order of the influence degree was sulfate > phosphate > ammonia > nitrate. The changes of the major ions in soil by the exposure of graphene nanomaterials have also affected the response of selected bacteria.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.