Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32894336›Full record

ArticleInternational archives of occupational and environmental health2021

Lifetime cancer risks from occupational radiation exposure among workers at interventional radiology departments.

Won Jin Lee, Ye Jin Bang, Eun Shil Cha, Young Min Kim, Sung Bum Cho

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International archives of occupational and environmental health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Radiation safety in interventional nephrology.World journal of nephrology · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Occupational Health Hazards in the Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory: Results of the 2023 SCAI Survey.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Won Jin LeeDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine, 73, Goryeodae-ro, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul, 02841, South Korea. leewj@korea.ac.kr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0254-7267
Ye Jin BangDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine, 73, Goryeodae-ro, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul, 02841, South Korea.
Eun Shil ChaDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine, 73, Goryeodae-ro, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul, 02841, South Korea.
Young Min KimDepartment of Statistics, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, South Korea.
Sung Bum ChoDepartment of Radiology, Korea University Anam Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Korea University · KRKorea University Medical Center · KRKyungpook National University · KR

Funding

National Research Foundation of Korea 2020R1A2C1008891
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeInterventional medical radiation workers represent an under-studied population worldwide, although they receive relatively high occupational radiation doses. This study aimed to estimate the lifetime cancer risk from occupational radiation exposure among workers at interventional radiology departments.

methodsA field survey of interventional medical workers in nationwide branches of the Korean Society of Interventional Radiology was conducted in 2017. Organ-specific radiation doses were estimated using national dose registry data and conversion coefficients provided by the International Commission on Radiological Protection. Lifetime attributable risk (LAR) and lifetime fractional risk (LFR) were calculated based on realistic exposure scenarios using a radiation risk assessment tool.

resultsLARs from occupational radiation exposure until the age of retirement for all cancers combined were 338 (90.3-796.1), 121 (33.5-288.7), and 156 (41.1-390.6) per 100,000 individuals for male radiologists, male radiologic technologists, and female nurses, respectively. LFR for all cancers combined ranged from 0.22% (0.06-0.53) to 0.63% (0.17-1.47). Regarding the organ site, the highest LAR and LFR among all groups were observed for thyroid cancer.

conclusionThis study provides timely evidence of potential cancer burden from the current levels of occupational radiation exposure among workers at interventional radiology departments. The risks varied by occupational groups, and workers, particularly interventional radiologists, need to be carefully monitored for radiation.

Indexed as

Occupational ExposureRadiation ExposureRadiology, InterventionalAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasms, Radiation-InducedNurse SpecialistsOccupational DiseasesRadiologistsRepublic of KoreaRiskThyroid NeoplasmsHealth professionalslifetime attributable riskNeoplasmOccupation

Identifiers

PMID32894336
OpenAlexW3084030704

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.