Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32894187›Full record

ArticleGenome biology2020

Alignment and mapping methodology influence transcript abundance estimation.

Avi Srivastava, Laraib Malik, Hirak Sarkar, Mohsen Zakeri, Fatemeh Almodaresi, Charlotte Soneson, Michael I Love, Carl Kingsford, Rob Patro

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 102 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
102citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

102 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Honokiol-mediated reversal of cisplatin-induced transcriptomic changes in outer hair cells.Biomedicine & pharmacotherapy = Biomedecine & pharmacotherapie · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Stem Cells From Human Exfoliated Deciduous Teeth as a Potent Cell Therapy for Radiation-Induced Osteonecrosis Model.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

42 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Avi SrivastavaDepartment of Computer Science, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, USA.
Laraib MalikDepartment of Computer Science, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, USA.
Hirak SarkarDepartment of Computer Science, University of Maryland, College Park, USA.
Mohsen ZakeriDepartment of Computer Science, University of Maryland, College Park, USA.
Fatemeh AlmodaresiDepartment of Computer Science, University of Maryland, College Park, USA.
Charlotte SonesonFriedrich Miescher Institute for Biomedical Research, Basel, Switzerland.
Michael I LoveDepartment of Biostatistics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, USA.
Carl KingsfordComputational Biology Department, School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA.
Rob PatroDepartment of Computer Science, University of Maryland, College Park, USA. rob@cs.umd.edu.

Funding

Statistical Methods for Cancer Clinical TrialsP01CA142538 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI DAVIDIAN, MARIE, KOSOROK, MICHAEL R · 2010 to 2019
$21.3M
TrainingP41GM103712 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI FAEDER, JAMES · 2012 to 2021
$16.3M
A Modular Framework for Accurate, Interpretable, and Reproducible Analysis of Long Read RNA-Seq DataR01HG009937 · NHGRI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Michael Isaiah Love, Robert Patro · 2018 to 2026
$2.8M
Data Discovery: Computational Methods for Searching Short-Read Sequencing Experiments - Administrative SupplementR01GM122935 · NIGMS · CARNEGIE-MELLON UNIVERSITY · PI KINGSFORD, CARLETON LEE · 2017 to 2021
$1.2M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA142538NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG009937NIGMS NIH HHS P41 GM103712NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM122935
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe accuracy of transcript quantification using RNA-seq data depends on many factors, such as the choice of alignment or mapping method and the quantification model being adopted. While the choice of quantification model has been shown to be important, considerably less attention has been given to comparing the effect of various read alignment approaches on quantification accuracy.

resultsWe investigate the influence of mapping and alignment on the accuracy of transcript quantification in both simulated and experimental data, as well as the effect on subsequent differential expression analysis. We observe that, even when the quantification model itself is held fixed, the effect of choosing a different alignment methodology, or aligning reads using different parameters, on quantification estimates can sometimes be large and can affect downstream differential expression analyses as well. These effects can go unnoticed when assessment is focused too heavily on simulated data, where the alignment task is often simpler than in experimentally acquired samples. We also introduce a new alignment methodology, called selective alignment, to overcome the shortcomings of lightweight approaches without incurring the computational cost of traditional alignment.

conclusionWe observe that, on experimental datasets, the performance of lightweight mapping and alignment-based approaches varies significantly, and highlight some of the underlying factors. We show this variation both in terms of quantification and downstream differential expression analysis. In all comparisons, we also show the improved performance of our proposed selective alignment method and suggest best practices for performing RNA-seq quantification.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAnimalsChromosome MappingGene Expression ProfilingMiceSequence AlignmentSequence Analysis, RNATranscriptomeQuantificationRead-alignmentRNA-seq

Identifiers

PMID32894187
PMCPMC7487471

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.