Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32894173›Full record

ArticleParasites & vectors2020

Drivers of molecular and morphometric variation in Triatoma brasiliensis (Hemiptera: Triatominae): the resolution of geometric morphometrics for populational structuring on a microgeographical scale.

Edgard H Kamimura, Maria Carolina Viana, Maurício Lilioso, Fernanda H M Fontes, Dayane Pires-Silva, Carolina Valença-Barbosa, Ana L Carbajal-de-la-Fuente, Elaine Folly-Ramos, Vera N Solferin, Patricia J Thyssen and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Parasites & vectors, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. The Body of Chagas Disease Vectors.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Characterization ofInsects · 2023
    Article
  5. Wing morphology variations inFrontiers in veterinary science · 2023
    Article
  6. Morphological Stasis in Time? AAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Edgard H KamimuraInstituto de Biologia, Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, Brazil.
Maria Carolina VianaInstituto de Biologia, Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, Brazil.
Maurício LiliosoInstituto de Biologia, Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, Brazil.
Fernanda H M FontesInstituto de Biologia, Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, Brazil.
Dayane Pires-SilvaInstituto de Biologia, Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, Brazil.
Carolina Valença-BarbosaInstituto de Biologia, Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, Brazil.
Ana L Carbajal-de-la-FuenteCentro Nacional de Diagnóstico e Investigación en Endemo-Epidemias (CeNDIE), Administración Nacional de Laboratorios e Institutos de Salud "Dr. Carlos Malbrán" (ANLIS), Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Elaine Folly-RamosUniversidade Federal da Paraíba (UFPB), Campus IV, Rio Tinto, Brazil.
Vera N SolferinInstituto de Biologia, Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, Brazil.
Patricia J ThyssenInstituto de Biologia, Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, Brazil.
Jane CostaLaboratório de Biodiversidade Entomológica, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (IOC/Fiocruz-RJ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Carlos E AlmeidaInstituto de Biologia, Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, Brazil. almeida_ce@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4605-2618

Funding

CNPQ 434260/2018-5FAPESP 17/21359-8FAPESP 18/04098-9FAPESP 18/04205-0FAPESP 18/04594-6FAPESP 18/20053-5FAPESP 18/21214-2FAPESP 2016/08176-9
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe protozoan Trypanosoma cruzi circulates in semiarid areas of northeastern Brazil in distinct ecotopes (sylvatic, peridomestic and domestic) where Triatoma brasiliensis Neiva, 1911 is the most important Chagas disease vector. In this study, we analyzed microevolutionary and demographic aspects of T. brasiliensis populations at the ecotypic, micro and macro-geographic scales by combining morphometrics and molecular results. Additionally, we aimed to address the resolution of both markers for delimiting populations in distinct scales.

methodsWe sampled populations of T. brasiliensis from distinct ecotypic and geographic sites in the states Rio Grande do Norte (RN) and Paraíba (PB). The geometric morphometry was carried out with 13 landmarks on the right wings (n = 698) and the genetic structure was assessed by sequencing a region of cytochrome b mitochondrial gene (n = 221). Mahalanobis distance (MD) and coefficient of molecular differentiation (Φ

resultsLittle structure was observed for both markers for macro-geographic scales. Mantel tests comparing geographic, morphometric and genetic matrices showed low correlation (all R

conclusionsWe believe that T. brasiliensis carries in its genotype a source of information to allow the phenotypical plasticity across its whole distribution for shaping populations, which may have caused a lack of population delimitation for CVAs in morphometric analysis for macro-geographic scale analysis. On the other hand, the pattern of morphometric results in micro-geographic scales showed well-defined groups, highlighting the potential of this tool to inferences on the source for infestation.

Indexed as

TriatomaAnimalsBrazilChagas DiseaseCytochromes bGenes, InsectGenetics, PopulationInsect VectorsPopulation DynamicsCytochromes bChagas diseasePhenotypic plasticityPopulation structureTriatomine ecologyVectors

Identifiers

PMID32894173
PMCPMC7487581

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.