ReviewJournal of menopausal medicine2020
A Review of Pharmacological Treatments for Vaginal Atrophy in Postmenopausal Women in Iran.
Review in Journal of menopausal medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Vaginal atrophy is one of the most common menopausal complications and is often overlooked. There are various pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatment approaches to reduce vaginal atrophy; however, no comprehensive study on a convenient, affordable, inexpensive, and noninvasive treatment with fewer complications has been conducted so far. Thus, the current study aimed to provide a systematic review of pharmacological treatment for vaginal atrophy in postmenopausal women in Iran. In this systematic review, all Iranian articles published in Persian or English during 2009 to 2019 were collected and analyzed by searching the Scopus, PubMed, Web of Science, Magiran, Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (IRCT), and Cochrane Library databases. The inclusion criteria were clinical trials for vaginal atrophy and menopause. Based on the selection criteria, articles with a Jadad scale score of 3 and above were included in the study and qualitatively analyzed. Overall, 15 clinical trials met the inclusion criteria. In total, 12 articles examined the efficacy of pharmacological treatments (including three herbal medicines, three vitamins and dietary supplements, and two chemical drugs) in treating vaginal atrophy in postmenopausal women. Various types of medication have been used to improve vaginal atrophy, and effective treatments include licorice, chamomile, royal jelly, vitamin E, vitamin D, hyaluronic acid, and Vagifem; however, the results of studies on fennel have been inconsistent. However, considering the small number of studies reviewed, further studies with a stronger methodology are needed to confirm the efficacy of these medications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.