Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32893416›Full record

ArticleJournal of genetic counseling2021

Adaptation and validation of the Genetic Counseling Outcome Scale for autism spectrum disorders and related conditions.

Afiqah Yusuf, Iskra Peltekova, Tal Savion-Lemieux, Jennifer Frei, Ridha Joober, Jennifer Howe, Stephen W Scherer, Mayada Elsabbagh

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of genetic counseling, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Using Rasch measurement theory to explore the fitness for purpose of the genetic counseling outcome scale: a tale of two scales.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Afiqah YusufAzrieli Centre for Autism Research, Montreal Neurological Institute-Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-3092-3095
Iskra PeltekovaAzrieli Centre for Autism Research, Montreal Neurological Institute-Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Tal Savion-LemieuxResearch-Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Jennifer FreiResearch-Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Ridha JooberDepartment of Psychiatry, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Jennifer HoweThe Centre for Applied Genomics, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Stephen W SchererThe Centre for Applied Genomics, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Mayada ElsabbaghAzrieli Centre for Autism Research, Montreal Neurological Institute-Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital · CAMcGill University Health Centre · CADouglas Mental Health University Institute · CAHospital for Sick Children · CAUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The genetics care pathway experienced by families affected by autism spectrum disorder (ASD) around the time of diagnosis is currently uncharacterized and potentially variable across contexts. The lack of consensus on outcome measures to capture the impact of genetic services for these families shows a gap in understanding and optimizing this genetics care pathway. The Genetic Counseling Outcome Scale (GCOS-24) is a validated outcome measure of clinical genetics services. The current study aims to adapt and validate the GCOS-24 as an outcome measure in the context routine genetic testing in ASD and related conditions. Families seen for their child's developmental evaluation for ASD and related conditions were invited to participate in a genomics cohort between 2016 and 2018. Families (n = 111) completed the mGCOS-24 (modified GCOS-24), adapted from the original GCOS-24 by clinicians working in the target population's routine care pathway. The mGCOS-24 has acceptable internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.84) and high test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.88). It also inversely correlates with stress as measured by Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10) and distress, as measured by the Distress Thermometer, rs ≥ 0.39, ps < 0.001. The mGCOS-24 had adequate readability, as supported by cognitive interviews completed by a sub-sample of five mothers of a child with ASD. Together, our findings show that the mGCOS-24 has good validity for the target population. Preliminary characterization of the genetics care pathway in this population revealed remarkable variability in pre-test counseling and limited post-test counseling. The use of the mGCOS-24 as an outcome measure is useful in filling some of these gaps by offering a way to assess, and in the future, optimize the genetics care pathway for families affected by autism and related neurodevelopmental conditions.

Indexed as

Autism Spectrum DisorderGenetic CounselingChildGenetic TestingHumansReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and Questionnairesautism spectrum disorderempowermentgenetic testingpatient-reported outcome measures

Identifiers

PMID32893416
PMCPMC7891368
OpenAlexW3084189251

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.