Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32893399›Full record

ArticlePsycho-oncology2020

Tailoring virtual human-delivered interventions: A digital intervention promoting colorectal cancer screening for Black women.

Melissa J Vilaro, Danyell S Wilson-Howard, Lauren N Griffin, Fatemeh Tavassoli, Mohan S Zalake, Benjamin C Lok, Francois P Modave, Thomas J George, Peter J Carek, Janice L Krieger

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psycho-oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Melissa J VilaroSTEM Translational Communication Center, College of Journalism & Communications, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3975-0274
Danyell S Wilson-HowardDepartment of Chemistry, Bethune-Cookman University, Daytona Beach, Florida, USA.
Lauren N GriffinSTEM Translational Communication Center, College of Journalism & Communications, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
Fatemeh TavassoliDepartment of Computer & Information Science & Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
Mohan S ZalakeDepartment of Computer & Information Science & Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
Benjamin C LokDepartment of Computer & Information Science & Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1190-3729
Francois P ModaveDepartment of Health Outcomes & Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4366-0757
Thomas J GeorgeDivision of Hematology & Oncology, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6249-9180
Peter J CarekDepartment of Community Health & Family Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
Janice L KriegerSTEM Translational Communication Center, College of Journalism & Communications, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9950-9170
University of Florida · USBethune-Cookman University · USUniversity of Florida Health · US

Funding

Reporting Nutrition Risk Factors via Virtual Humans for Colorectal Cancer Prevention.R01CA207689 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI LOK, BENJAMIN, RAUP-KRIEGER, JANICE LEE · 2017 to 2021
$3.7M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA207689NCI NIH HHS R01CA207689
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveDespite efforts to reduce cancer disparities, Black women remain underrepresented in cancer research. Virtual health assistants (VHAs) are one promising digital technology for communicating health messages and promoting health behaviors to diverse populations. This study describes participant responses to a VHA-delivered intervention promoting colorectal cancer (CRC) screening with a home-stool test.

methodsWe recruited 53 non-Hispanic Black women 50 to 73 years old to participate in focus groups and think-aloud interviews and test a web-based intervention delivered by a race- and gender-concordant VHA. A user-centered design approach prioritized modifications to three successive versions of the intervention based on participants' comments.

resultsParticipants identified 26 cues relating to components of the VHA's credibility, including trustworthiness, expertise, and authority. Comments on early versions revealed preferences for communicating with a human doctor and negative critiques of the VHA's appearance and movements. Modifications to specific cues improved the user experience, and participants expressed increased willingness to engage with later versions of the VHA and the screening messages it delivered. Informed by the Modality, Agency, Interactivity, Navigability Model, we present a framework for developing credible VHA-delivered cancer screening messages.

conclusionsVHAs provide a systematic way to deliver health information. A culturally sensitive intervention designed for credibility promoted user interest in engaging with guideline-concordant CRC screening messages. We present strategies for effectively using cues to engage audiences with health messages, which can be applied to future research in varying contexts.

Indexed as

Black or African AmericanPatient Acceptance of Health CareTelemedicineAgedColorectal NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerFemaleFocus GroupsHealth CommunicationHumansMass ScreeningMiddle AgedOccult BloodTechnologycolorectal neoplasmscuesearly detection of cancerhealth communicationinternet-based interventiononcologypsycho-oncologyqualitative research

Identifiers

PMID32893399
PMCPMC7821126
OpenAlexW3084323190

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.