ReviewBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2022
European research networks to facilitate drug research in children.
Review in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- "Common sense is hard work" but benefits from persistent collaboration: Lessons learnt from the development of The Collaborative Network for European Clinical Trials for Children (c4c) to support the conduct of paediatric clinical trials of medicines.Contemporary clinical trials communications · 2025Article
- Developing and streamlining clinical trial services to support pediatric drug development across 21 countries in Europe: insights from the conect4children (c4c) network.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Mapping the rare disease paediatric clinical trial availabilities in Europe.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025Article
- Harmonizing Quality Improvement Metrics Across Global Trial Networks to Advance Paediatric Clinical Trials Delivery.Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science · 2024Article
- Access to novel drugs and therapeutics for children and youth: Eliciting citizens' values to inform public funding decisions.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2023Article
- Paediatric Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Multi-Stakeholder Perspective to Improve Development of Drugs for Children and Adolescents.Journal of Crohn's & colitis · 2023Article
- Health technology assessment of paediatric medicines: European landscape, challenges and opportunities inside the conect4children project.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2022Review
- European research networks to facilitate drug research in children.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2022Review
- Analysis of Paediatric Clinical Trial Characteristics and Activity Over 23 Years-Impact of the European Paediatric Regulation on a Single French Clinical Research Center.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2022Article
- Paediatric clinical research in Europe: an insight on experts' needs and perspectives.Contemporary clinical trials communications · 2021Article
- Pediatric biobanks and parents of disabled children associations opinions on establishing children repositories in developing countries.Journal of medicine and lifeArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Paediatric drug development faces several barriers. These include fragmentation of stakeholders and inconsistent processes during the conduct of research. This review summarises recent efforts to overcome these barriers in Europe. Two exemplar initiatives are described. The European Paediatric Translational Research Infrastructure facilitates preclinical research and other work that underpins clinical trials. conect4children facilitates the design and implementation of clinical trials. Both these initiatives listen to the voices of children and their advocates. Coordination of research needs specific effort that supplements work on science, resources and the policy context.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.