Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32893366›Full record

ArticleJournal of surgical oncology2020

Management of the positive sentinel lymph node in the post-MSLT-II era.

Brooke C Bredbeck, Eman Mubarak, Daniela G Zubieta, Rachael Tesorero, Adam R Holmes, Lesly A Dossett, Kyle K VanKoevering, Alison B Durham, Tasha M Hughes

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of surgical oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Brooke C BredbeckDepartment of Surgery, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0011-7068
Eman MubarakDepartment of Surgery, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Daniela G ZubietaDepartment of Surgery, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Rachael TesoreroDepartment of Surgery, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Adam R HolmesDepartment of Surgery, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Lesly A DossettDepartment of Surgery, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Kyle K VanKoeveringRogel Cancer Center, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Alison B DurhamRogel Cancer Center, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5051-5374
Tasha M HughesDepartment of Surgery, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4678-1143
Michigan Medicine · US

Funding

University of Michigan Surgical Oncology Research Training ProgramT32CA009672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI JACQUELINE SARA JERUSS, WEIPING ZOU · 1991 to 2026
$6.0M
NCI NIH HHS BCB is supported by the Ruth L. Kirschstein ResearchNCI NIH HHS NIH T32 CA009672NCI NIH HHS T32 CA009672
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesThe publication of MSLT-II shifted recommendations for management of sentinel lymph node biopsy positive (SLNB+) melanoma to favor active surveillance. We examined trends in immediate completion lymph node dissection (CLND) following publication of MSLT-II.

methodsUsing a prospective melanoma database at a high-volume center, we identified a cohort of consecutive SLNB+ patients from July 2016 to April 2019. Patient and disease characteristics were analyzed with multivariate logistic regression to examine factors associated with CLND.

resultsTwo hundred and thirty-five patients were included for analysis. CLND rates were 67%, 33%, and 26% for the year before, year after, and second-year following MSLT-II. Factors associated with undergoing CLND included primary located in the head and neck (59% vs 33%, P = .003 and odds ratio [OR], 5.22, P = .002) and higher sentinel node tumor burden (43% vs 10% for tumor burden ≥0.1 mm, P < .001 and OR, 8.64, P = .002).

conclusionsRates of CLND in SLNB+ melanoma decreased dramatically, albeit not uniformly, following MSLT-II. Factors that increased the likelihood of immediate CLND were primary tumor located in the head and neck and high sentinel node tumor burden. These groups were underrepresented in MSLT-II, suggesting that clinicians are wary of implementing active surveillance recommendations for patients perceived as higher risk.

Indexed as

Databases, FactualTumor BurdenAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overChildChild, PreschoolFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLymph Node ExcisionMaleMelanomaMiddle AgedPrognosisCLNDmelanomaMSLT-IISLNB

Identifiers

PMID32893366
PMCPMC7752829
OpenAlexW3083507505

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.