Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32892763›Full record

ArticleEuropean psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists2020

Prevalence of maternal antenatal anxiety and its association with demographic and socioeconomic factors: A multicentre study in Italy.

L Cena, F Mirabella, G Palumbo, A Gigantesco, A Trainini, A Stefana

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Somatic comorbidities of mental disorders in pregnancy.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2023
    Article
  11. Prevalence of Antenatal Anxiety in European Women: A Literature Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

L CenaDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, Section of Neuroscience, Observatory of Perinatal Clinical Psychology, University of Brescia, viale Europa 11, Brescia25123, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3162-9237
F MirabellaCenter for Behavioural Sciences and Mental Health, National Institute of Health, Viale Regina Elena 299, Rome00161, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8090-9465
G PalumboCenter for Behavioural Sciences and Mental Health, National Institute of Health, Viale Regina Elena 299, Rome00161, Italy.
A GigantescoCenter for Behavioural Sciences and Mental Health, National Institute of Health, Viale Regina Elena 299, Rome00161, Italy.
A TraininiDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, Section of Neuroscience, Observatory of Perinatal Clinical Psychology, University of Brescia, viale Europa 11, Brescia25123, Italy.
A StefanaDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, Section of Neuroscience, Observatory of Perinatal Clinical Psychology, University of Brescia, viale Europa 11, Brescia25123, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4807-7184

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMaternal antenatal anxiety is very common, and despite its short- and long-term effects on both mothers and fetus outcomes, it has received less attention than it deserves in scientific research and clinical practice. Therefore, we aimed to estimate the prevalence of state anxiety in the antenatal period, and to analyze its association with demographic and socioeconomic factors.

methodsA total of 1142 pregnant women from nine Italian healthcare centers were assessed through the state scale of the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory and a clinical interview. Demographic and socioeconomic factors were also measured.

resultsThe prevalence of anxiety was 24.3% among pregnant women. There was a significantly higher risk of anxiety in pregnant women with low level of education (p < 0.01), who are jobless (p < 0.01), and who have economic problems (p < 0.01). Furthermore, pregnant women experience higher level of anxiety when they have not planned the pregnancy (p < 0.01), have a history of abortion (p < 0.05), and have children living at the time of the current pregnancy (p < 0.05).

conclusionThere exists a significant association between maternal antenatal anxiety and economic conditions. Early evaluation of socioeconomic status of pregnant women and their families in order to identify disadvantaged situations might reduce the prevalence of antenatal anxiety and its direct and indirect costs.

Indexed as

Socioeconomic FactorsAdolescentAdultAnxietyFemaleHumansItalyMothersPregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsPregnant PeoplePrevalenceSocial ClassYoung AdultDemographic factorsmaternal antenatal anxietyscreeningsocioeconomic factors

Identifiers

PMID32892763
PMCPMC7576533

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.