Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32892726›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2020

Effects of drought and meteorological forcing on carbon and water fluxes in Nordic forests during the dry summer of 2018.

Anders Lindroth, Jutta Holst, Maj-Lena Linderson, Mika Aurela, Tobias Biermann, Michal Heliasz, Jinshu Chi, Andreas Ibrom, Pasi Kolari, Leif Klemedtsson and 14 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 86 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Global drought trends and future projections.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2022
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Spring enhancement and summer reduction in carbon uptake during the 2018 drought in northwestern Europe.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020
    Article
  7. A historical, geographical and ecological perspective on the 2018 European summer drought.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Anders LindrothDepartment of Physical Geography and Ecosystem Science, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Jutta HolstDepartment of Physical Geography and Ecosystem Science, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Maj-Lena LindersonDepartment of Physical Geography and Ecosystem Science, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Mika AurelaFinnish Meteorological Institute, Helsinki, Finland.
Tobias BiermannCentre for Environmental and Climate Research, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Michal HeliaszCentre for Environmental and Climate Research, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Jinshu ChiDepartment of Forest Ecology and Management, The Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umeå, Sweden.
Andreas IbromDepartment of Environmental Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark.
Pasi KolariInstitute for Atmospheric and Earth System Research, Helsinki University, Helsinki, Finland.
Leif KlemedtssonDepartment of Earth Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Alisa KrasnovaInstitute of Ecology and Earth Sciences, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.
Tuomas LaurilaFinnish Meteorological Institute, Helsinki, Finland.
Irene LehnerCentre for Environmental and Climate Research, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Annalea LohilaFinnish Meteorological Institute, Helsinki, Finland.
Ivan MammarellaInstitute for Atmospheric and Earth System Research, Helsinki University, Helsinki, Finland.
Meelis MölderDepartment of Physical Geography and Ecosystem Science, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Mikaell Ottosson LöfveniusDepartment of Forest Ecology and Management, The Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umeå, Sweden.
Matthias PeichlDepartment of Forest Ecology and Management, The Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umeå, Sweden.
Kim PilegaardDepartment of Environmental Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark.
Kaido SoosarInstitute of Ecology and Earth Sciences, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.
Timo VesalaInstitute for Atmospheric and Earth System Research, Helsinki University, Helsinki, Finland.
Patrik VestinDepartment of Physical Geography and Ecosystem Science, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Per WeslienDepartment of Earth Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Mats NilssonDepartment of Forest Ecology and Management, The Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umeå, Sweden.
Lund University · SESwedish University of Agricultural Sciences · SEFinnish Meteorological Institute · FITechnical University of Denmark · DKUniversity of Gothenburg · SEUniversity of Tartu · EE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Nordic region was subjected to severe drought in 2018 with a particularly long-lasting and large soil water deficit in Denmark, Southern Sweden and Estonia. Here, we analyse the impact of the drought on carbon and water fluxes in 11 forest ecosystems of different composition: spruce, pine, mixed and deciduous. We assess the impact of drought on fluxes by estimating the difference (anomaly) between year 2018 and a reference year without drought. Unexpectedly, the evaporation was only slightly reduced during 2018 compared to the reference year at two sites while it increased or was nearly unchanged at all other sites. This occurred under a 40 to 60% reduction in mean surface conductance and the concurrent increase in evaporative demand due to the warm and dry weather. The anomaly in the net ecosystem productivity (NEP) was 93% explained by a multilinear regression with the anomaly in heterotrophic respiration and the relative precipitation deficit as independent variables. Most of the variation (77%) was explained by the heterotrophic component. Six out of 11 forests reduced their annual NEP with more than 50 g C m

Indexed as

Climate ChangeDroughtsCarbonCarbon CycleForestsMeteorological ConceptsScandinavian and Nordic CountriesSeasonsSoilWaterCarbonSoilWaterecosystem respirationevaporationgross primary productivityheterotrophic respirationnet ecosystem productivitysurface conductance

Identifiers

PMID32892726
PMCPMC7485108
OpenAlexW3083521542

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.