Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32892244›Full record

ArticleActa neuropathologica2020

The immunohistochemical, DNA methylation, and chromosomal copy number profile of cauda equina paraganglioma is distinct from extra-spinal paraganglioma.

Biswarathan Ramani, Rohit Gupta, Jasper Wu, Jairo Barreto, Andrew W Bollen, Tarik Tihan, Praveen V Mummaneni, Christopher Ames, Aaron Clark, Nancy Ann Oberheim Bush and 16 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta neuropathologica, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Cauda equina neuroendocrine tumor: a case report and diagnostic update.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Neuropathologic features of central nervous system hemangioblastoma.Journal of pathology and translational medicine · 2022
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Biswarathan RamaniDivision of Neuropathology, Department of Pathology, University of California, San Francisco, 505 Parnassus Avenue, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA.
Rohit GuptaDivision of Neuropathology, Department of Pathology, University of California, San Francisco, 505 Parnassus Avenue, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA.
Jasper WuDivision of Neuropathology, Department of Pathology, University of California, San Francisco, 505 Parnassus Avenue, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA.
Jairo BarretoDivision of Neuropathology, Department of Pathology, University of California, San Francisco, 505 Parnassus Avenue, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA.
Andrew W BollenDivision of Neuropathology, Department of Pathology, University of California, San Francisco, 505 Parnassus Avenue, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA.
Tarik TihanDivision of Neuropathology, Department of Pathology, University of California, San Francisco, 505 Parnassus Avenue, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA.
Praveen V MummaneniDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Christopher AmesDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Aaron ClarkDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Nancy Ann Oberheim BushDivision of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Nicholas ButowskiDivision of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Daniel PhillipsPathology Associates, Clovis, CA, USA.
Bruce E KingDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Penn Medicine Lancaster General Hospital, Lancaster, PA, USA.
Susan M BatorDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Penn Medicine Lancaster General Hospital, Lancaster, PA, USA.
Elizabeth C TreynorDepartment of Pathology, Washington Hospital, Fremont, CA, USA.
Viktor ZherebitskiyDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Saskatchewan College of Medicine, Saskatoon, SK, Canada.
Paula S QuinnDominican Hospital, Santa Cruz, CA, USA.
Jeffrey B WalkerBoise Pathology Group, St. Luke's, Boise, ID, USA.
Melike PekmezciDivision of Neuropathology, Department of Pathology, University of California, San Francisco, 505 Parnassus Avenue, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA.
Daniel V SullivanDivision of Neuropathology, Department of Pathology, University of California, San Francisco, 505 Parnassus Avenue, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA.
Jeffrey W HofmannDivision of Neuropathology, Department of Pathology, University of California, San Francisco, 505 Parnassus Avenue, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA.
Emily A SloanDivision of Neuropathology, Department of Pathology, University of California, San Francisco, 505 Parnassus Avenue, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA.
Susan M ChangDivision of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Mitchel S BergerDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
David A SolomonDivision of Neuropathology, Department of Pathology, University of California, San Francisco, 505 Parnassus Avenue, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA.
Arie PerryDivision of Neuropathology, Department of Pathology, University of California, San Francisco, 505 Parnassus Avenue, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA. arie.perry@ucsf.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-8300-7261
University of California, San Francisco · USLancaster General Hospital · USDominican Hospital · USSt. Luke’s Boise Medical Center · USUniversity of Saskatchewan · CAWashington Hospital · US

Funding

Tissue CoreP50CA097257 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Joseph F Costello · 2002 to 2026
$57.4M
Cohesin gene mutations in tumorigenesisDP5OD021403 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI SOLOMON, DAVID A. · 2015 to 2019
$2.0M
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA097257NIH HHS DP5 OD021403
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Paragangliomas are neuroendocrine tumors of the autonomic nervous system that are variably clinically functional and have a potential for metastasis. Up to 40% occur in the setting of a hereditary syndrome, most commonly due to germline mutations in succinate dehydrogenase (SDHx) genes. Immunohistochemically, paragangliomas are characteristically GATA3-positive and cytokeratin-negative, with loss of SDHB expression in most hereditary cases. In contrast, the rare paragangliomas arising in the cauda equina (CEP) or filum terminale region have been shown to be hormonally silent, clinically indolent, and have variable keratin expression, suggesting these tumors may represent a separate pathologic entity. We retrospectively evaluated 17 CEPs from 11 male and 6 female patients with a median age of 38 years (range 21-82), none with a family history of neuroendocrine neoplasia. Six of the 17 tumors demonstrated prominent gangliocytic or ganglioneuromatous differentiation. By immunohistochemistry, none of the CEPs showed GATA3 positivity or loss of SDHB staining; all 17 CEPs were cytokeratin positive. Genome-wide DNA methylation profiling was performed on 12 of the tumors and compared with publicly available genome-wide DNA methylation data. Clustering analysis showed that CEPs form a distinct epigenetic group, separate from paragangliomas of extraspinal sites, pheochromocytomas, and other neuroendocrine neoplasms. Copy number analysis revealed diploid genomes in the vast majority of CEPs, whereas extraspinal paragangliomas were mostly aneuploid with recurrent trisomy 1q and monosomies of 1p, 3, and 11, none of which were present in the cohort of CEP. Together, these findings indicate that CEPs likely represent a distinct entity. Future genomic studies are needed to further elucidate the molecular pathogenesis of these tumors.

Indexed as

ImmunohistochemistryAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCauda EquinaCentral Nervous System NeoplasmsDNA Copy Number VariationsDNA MethylationFemaleGerm-Line MutationHumansMaleMiddle AgedParagangliomaYoung AdultCauda equina paragangliomaDNA methylation profilingFilum terminaleMolecular neuropathologyNeuroendocrine tumorSuccinate dehydrogenase

Identifiers

PMID32892244
PMCPMC7682537
OpenAlexW3083344004

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.