ArticleActa neuropathologica2020
The immunohistochemical, DNA methylation, and chromosomal copy number profile of cauda equina paraganglioma is distinct from extra-spinal paraganglioma.
Article in Acta neuropathologica, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Sellar region neurocytomas exhibit a CIMP and neuroendocrine-like epigenetic signature distinct from other intra-axial neurocytomas.Acta neuropathologica · 2026Article
- Clinicoradiological Features and Surgical Outcomes of Cauda Equina Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Cauda equina neuroendocrine tumor: a case report and diagnostic update.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026Article
- Cauda equina neuroendocrine tumour of the filum terminale: a rare cause of persistent sciatica.Oxford medical case reports · 2025Article
- Intradural paragangliomas in the cauda equina region: a case report and literature review.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Cauda Equina Neuroendocrine Tumors with Ganglioneuromatous Elements are Best Classified as Composite Gangliocytoma/Neuroma and Neuroendocrine Tumor (COGNET).Endocrine pathology · 2024Article
- Concurrent multiple cerebral cavernous malformations and cauda equina paraganglioma: illustrative case.Journal of neurosurgery. Case lessons · 2024Article
- Cauda equina neuroendocrine tumor: a report of three cases and review of the literature with focus on differential diagnosis and postoperative management.Neurosurgical review · 2024Review
- Cauda equina neuroendocrine tumors: A single institutional imaging review of cases over two decades.The neuroradiology journal · 2024Review
- Cauda equina neuroendocrine tumors show biological features distinct from other paragangliomas and visceral neuroendocrine tumors.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2023Article
- Neuropathologic features of central nervous system hemangioblastoma.Journal of pathology and translational medicine · 2022Review
- Overview of the 2022 WHO Classification of Paragangliomas and Pheochromocytomas.Endocrine pathology · 2022Review
- Overview of the 2022 WHO Classification of Neuroendocrine Neoplasms.Endocrine pathology · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
26 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Paragangliomas are neuroendocrine tumors of the autonomic nervous system that are variably clinically functional and have a potential for metastasis. Up to 40% occur in the setting of a hereditary syndrome, most commonly due to germline mutations in succinate dehydrogenase (SDHx) genes. Immunohistochemically, paragangliomas are characteristically GATA3-positive and cytokeratin-negative, with loss of SDHB expression in most hereditary cases. In contrast, the rare paragangliomas arising in the cauda equina (CEP) or filum terminale region have been shown to be hormonally silent, clinically indolent, and have variable keratin expression, suggesting these tumors may represent a separate pathologic entity. We retrospectively evaluated 17 CEPs from 11 male and 6 female patients with a median age of 38 years (range 21-82), none with a family history of neuroendocrine neoplasia. Six of the 17 tumors demonstrated prominent gangliocytic or ganglioneuromatous differentiation. By immunohistochemistry, none of the CEPs showed GATA3 positivity or loss of SDHB staining; all 17 CEPs were cytokeratin positive. Genome-wide DNA methylation profiling was performed on 12 of the tumors and compared with publicly available genome-wide DNA methylation data. Clustering analysis showed that CEPs form a distinct epigenetic group, separate from paragangliomas of extraspinal sites, pheochromocytomas, and other neuroendocrine neoplasms. Copy number analysis revealed diploid genomes in the vast majority of CEPs, whereas extraspinal paragangliomas were mostly aneuploid with recurrent trisomy 1q and monosomies of 1p, 3, and 11, none of which were present in the cohort of CEP. Together, these findings indicate that CEPs likely represent a distinct entity. Future genomic studies are needed to further elucidate the molecular pathogenesis of these tumors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.