Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32891924›Full record

ArticleParkinsonism & related disorders2020

Linear predictive coding distinguishes spectral EEG features of Parkinson's disease.

Md Fahim Anjum, Soura Dasgupta, Raghuraman Mudumbai, Arun Singh, James F Cavanagh, Nandakumar S Narayanan

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Parkinsonism & related disorders, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06984757 (Mid-frontal Delta/Theta and Cognitive Control), which is not on this map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06984757 naenrolling by invitationnot on this map

Mid-frontal Delta/Theta and Cognitive Control

TypeinterventionalSponsorNandakumar NarayananRan2017 to 2029Enrolled635ConditionsParkinson&Amp, Amp, #39, s Disease (PD)ArmsDeep-brain Stimulation, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Md Fahim AnjumDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, The University of Iowa, Iowa, USA. Electronic address: mdfahim-anjum@uiowa.edu.
Soura DasguptaDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, The University of Iowa, Iowa, USA; Shandong Academy of Sciences, Shandong, Jinan, China.
Raghuraman MudumbaiDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, The University of Iowa, Iowa, USA.
Arun SinghDivision of Basic Biomedical Sciences, Sanford School of Medicine, University of South Dakota, South Dakota, USA.
James F CavanaghDepartment of Psychology, University of New Mexico, New Mexico, USA.
Nandakumar S NarayananDepartment of Neurology, The University of Iowa, Iowa, USA.

Funding

Mid-frontal delta/theta rhythms and cognitive control in PDR01NS100849 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI JAMES F CAVANAGH, Nandakumar Narayanan · 2017 to 2026
$3.6M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS100849
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveWe have developed and validated a novel EEG-based signal processing approach to distinguish PD and control patients: Linear-predictive-coding EEG Algorithm for PD (LEAPD). This method efficiently encodes EEG time series into features that can detect PD in a computationally fast manner amenable to real time applications.

methodsWe included a total of 41 PD patients and 41 demographically-matched controls from New Mexico and Iowa. Data for all participants from New Mexico (27 PD patients and 27 controls) were used to evaluate in-sample LEAPD performance, with extensive cross-validation. Participants from Iowa (14 PD patients and 14 controls) were used for out-of-sample tests. Our method utilized data from six EEG leads which were as little as 2 min long.

resultsFor the in-sample dataset, LEAPD differentiated PD patients from controls with 85.3 ± 0.1% diagnostic accuracy, 93.3 ± 0.5% area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC), 87.9 ± 0.9% sensitivity, and 82.7 ± 1.1% specificity, with multiple cross-validations. After head-to-head comparison with state-of-the-art methods using our dataset, LEAPD showed a 13% increase in accuracy and a 15.5% increase in AUC. When the trained classifier was applied to a distinct out-of-sample dataset, LEAPD showed reliable performance with 85.7% diagnostic accuracy, 85.2% AUC, 85.7% sensitivity, and 85.7% specificity. No statistically significant effect of levodopa-ON and levodopa-OFF sessions were found.

conclusionWe describe LEAPD, an efficient algorithm that is suitable for real time application and captures spectral EEG features using few parameters and reliably differentiates PD patients from demographically-matched controls.

Indexed as

Machine LearningSignal Processing, Computer-AssistedAgedElectroencephalographyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedParkinson DiseaseReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificityClassifierDiagnosisEEGParkinson's disease

Identifiers

PMID32891924
PMCPMC7900258

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.