Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32891825›Full record

ArticleJournal of minimally invasive gynecology2021

Impact of Surgical Wait Time to Hysterectomy for Benign Gynecologic Disease.

Jessica Traylor, Nathanael Koelper, Sun Woo Kim, Mary D Sammel, Uduak U Andy

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of minimally invasive gynecology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. A comparison of patient-reported outcomes among Canadian women having hysterectomies.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. First Step to Equity and Organization in Waiting Lines for Stone Surgery. Translation of Prioritization Scores.International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jessica TraylorDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (all authors).. Electronic address: jtraylor@alumni.upenn.edu.
Nathanael KoelperDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (all authors).
Sun Woo KimDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (all authors).
Mary D SammelDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (all authors).
Uduak U AndyDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (all authors).
Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

STUDY

objectiveTo determine the impact of surgical wait time on healthcare use and surgical outcomes for patients undergoing hysterectomy for benign gynecologic indications.

designRetrospective cohort study.

settingUrban, academic tertiary care center. PATIENTS: Patients who underwent hysterectomy for benign disease between 2012 and 2018.

interventionsNone. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN

resultsPatients were categorized into 2 groups, dichotomized by surgical wait times >30 days or ≤30 days. Healthcare use was measured by the number of discrete patient interactions with the healthcare system through phone calls, secure electronic messaging, and office and emergency room visits. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression models were performed to assess the association between surgical wait time and healthcare use and perioperative outcomes while controlling for confounders. A total of 277 patients were included in our analysis: 106 (38.3%) had surgical wait times >30 days (median 47 days, range 24-68 days), and 171 (67.1%) had surgical wait times ≤30 days (median 19 days; range 12-26 days). The groups did not differ by age, insurance status, substance use, or comorbid conditions. Patients in the group with surgical wait times >30 days were more likely to have increased healthcare use (69 of 106, 65% vs 43 of 171, 25%; odds ratio 5.55; 95% confidence interval, 3.27-9.41). There were no differences in intraoperative complications (9 of 106, 8% vs 19 of 171, 11%; p = .482) or postoperative complications (28 of 106, 26% vs 32 of 171, 19%; p = .13) between the groups; however, after controlling for potential confounders, patients with surgical wait times >30 days were 3.22 times more likely to be readmitted than patients with surgical wait times ≤30 days (95% confidence interval, 1.27-8.19).

conclusionA surgical wait time >30 days in patients undergoing a hysterectomy for benign disease is associated with increased healthcare use in the interim. Although patients who experience longer surgical wait times do not experience worse surgical outcomes, they may be at higher risk for readmission after surgery. Targeted interventions to optimize perioperative coordination of care for patients undergoing a hysterectomy for benign disease, especially those within vulnerable populations, are needed to improve quality of care, decrease any redundant or inefficient healthcare use, and reduce any unnecessary delays.

Indexed as

Genital Diseases, FemaleWaiting ListsFemaleHumansHysterectomyOperative TimePostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesDelay to surgeryHealthcare usePerioperative outcomesTime to surgeryWaiting for surgery

Identifiers

PMID32891825
PMCPMC7470791
OpenAlexW3083141493

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.