Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32891242›Full record

ArticleArthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association2020

Editorial Commentary: Can We Evaluate Glenoid Bone With Magnetic Resonance Imaging? Yes, If You Have the Right Sequence.

Drew A Lansdown, Valentina Pedoia

Abstract readEditorialComment
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Current Concepts in the Measurement of Glenohumeral Bone Loss.Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2023
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Drew A LansdownUniversity of California, San Francisco.
Valentina PedoiaUniversity of California, San Francisco.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glenoid bone loss must be recognized when treating patients with shoulder instability to appropriately determine surgical treatment with either a soft-tissue stabilization or bony augmentation procedure. Three-dimensional reconstructions from computed tomography scans currently are the clinical gold standard for accurately evaluating glenoid bone loss. Novel advances in magnetic resonance imaging sequences and processing may allow for obtaining complete bony information from a single preoperative imaging study.

Indexed as

Joint InstabilityShoulder JointHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalMagnetic Resonance ImagingScapulaTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.