Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32890524›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics2020

Telemedicine in Radiation Oncology: Is It Here to Stay? Impacts on Patient Care and Resident Education.

Paulina M Gutkin, Nicolas D Prionas, Madeline O Minneci, Elena Allen, Katy E Balazy, Elham Rahimy, Daniel T Chang, Kathleen C Horst

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The impact and implications of virtual supportive cancer care during the COVID-19 pandemic: integrating patient and clinician perspectives.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Oncology patients' communication experiences during COVID-19: comparing telehealth consultations to in-person visits.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The Research on Patient Satisfaction with Remote Healthcare Prior to and during the COVID-19 Pandemic.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Paulina M GutkinDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
Nicolas D PrionasDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Madeline O MinneciDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
Elena AllenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
Katy E BalazyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
Elham RahimyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
Daniel T ChangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
Kathleen C HorstDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, California. Electronic address: kateh@stanford.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTelemedicine was rapidly and ubiquitously adopted during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, there are growing discussions as to its role postpandemic. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We surveyed patients, radiation oncology (RO) attendings, and RO residents to assess their experience with telemedicine. Surveys addressed quality of patient care and utility of telemedicine for teaching and learning core competencies. Satisfaction was rated on a 6-point Likert-type scale. The quality of teaching and learning was graded on a 5-point Likert-type scale, with overall scores calculated by the average rating of each core competency required by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (range, 1-5).

resultsResponses were collected from 56 patients, 12 RO attendings, and 13 RO residents. Patient feedback was collected at 17 new-patient, 22 on-treatment, and 17 follow-up video visits. Overall, 88% of patients were satisfied with virtual visits. A lower proportion of on-treatment patients rated their virtual visit as "very satisfactory" (68.2% vs 76.5% for new patients and 82.4% for follow-ups). Only 5.9% of the new patients and none of the follow-up patients were dissatisfied, and 27% of on-treatment patients were dissatisfied. The large majority of patients (88%) indicated that they would continue to use virtual visits as long as a physical examination was not needed. Overall scores for medical training were 4.1 out of 5 (range, 2.8-5.0) by RO residents and 3.2 (range, 2.0-4.0) by RO attendings. All residents and 92% of attendings indicated they would use telemedicine again; however, most indicated that telemedicine is best for follow-up visits.

conclusionsTelemedicine is a convenient means of delivering care to patients, with some limitations demonstrated for on-treatment patients. The majority of both patients and providers are interested in using telemedicine again, and it will likely continue to supplement patient care.

Indexed as

Radiation OncologyTelemedicineCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19Education, Medical, GraduateHumansInternship and ResidencyPandemicsPatient CarePneumonia, Viral

Identifiers

PMID32890524
PMCPMC7462793

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.