Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32890512›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics2020

Initial Impact and Operational Responses to the COVID-19 Pandemic by American Radiation Oncology Practices.

Daniel V Wakefield, Tim Sanders, Emily Wilson, Adam Hubler, Theodore DeWeese, Benjamin D Smith, Berend J Slotman, Gustavo R Sarria, Thomas Eichler, David L Schwartz

Open access · bronzeAbstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The Effects of COVID-19 on Cancer Care Provision: A Systematic Review.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Increase in the number of adjuvant radiotherapy treatments in breast cancer patients in 2022: effect of COVID-19 pandemic?Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The landscape of digital resources in radiation oncology.Technical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology · 2022
    Article
  8. COVID-19 Pandemic: Impact on Cancer Patients.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Variable Effect of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Radiation Oncology Practices in the United States.International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. RO Model: The Work Continues to Get it Right.International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Will the COVID Pandemic Lead to Uncounted Cancer Deaths in the Future?International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Daniel V WakefieldDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee; Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
Tim SandersAmerican Society for Radiation Oncology, Arlington, Virginia.
Emily WilsonAmerican Society for Radiation Oncology, Arlington, Virginia.
Adam HublerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee.
Theodore DeWeeseDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Benjamin D SmithDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Berend J SlotmanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam umc, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Gustavo R SarriaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.
Thomas EichlerVCU Health, Massey Cancer Center, Richmond, Virginia.
David L SchwartzDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee; Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas. Electronic address: dschwar4@uthsc.edu.
American Society for Radiation Oncology · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USUniversity of Tennessee Health Science Center · USAmsterdam UMC Location VUmc · NLHeidelberg University · DEJohns Hopkins University · USVirginia Cancer Institute · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIn February 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic reached the United States. The impact of the pandemic on the US radiation oncology field remains unknown. The American Society for Radiation Oncology surveyed US radiation oncology practice leaders to gauge initial impact and immediate operational responses to the pandemic. METHODS AND MATERIALS: From April 16 to April 30, 2020, the American Society for Radiation Oncology surveyed US radiation oncology practice leaders by email to gauge initial impact and immediate operational responses to the COVID-19 pandemic.

resultsTwo hundred twenty-two (43%) of 517 leaders responded from community and academic practices (62% and 34%, respectively), hospital-based and free-standing centers (69% and 29%), and metro and rural locations (88% and 12%). Practices reported treating an average of 1086 patients per year in 2019 (range, 0-7900) with an average daily treatment volume of 70 patients (range, 5-400). All practices reported uninterrupted operation. On average, practices were treating 68% of their typical volume (range, 10%-95%), with 92% implementing planned treatment postponement for lower risk patients. An estimated revenue decrease of 20% or more was experienced by 71% of practices. Confirmed COVID-19 patient cases were treated by 39% of practices. Seventy percent experienced staff shortages. Almost all (98%) practices implemented formal operational procedures to protect patients and staff, although personal protective equipment/infection control supply shortages were reported by 78% of practices. Seventy-four percent used telemedicine for virtual follow-up surveillance, and 15% leveraged telemedicine for on-treatment assessment.

conclusionsThe clinical and financial impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on US radiation oncology were deep and broad. Despite reported shortages in personal protective equipment, declines in revenue, and reduced patient volumes, practices adapted quickly by refining standard processes of care, implementing recommended safety measures, and employing telemedicine to facilitate treatment continuity. Patients with higher risk disease experienced uninterrupted access to care. We plan to continue regular surveying across the lifespan of the pandemic to document the geographic and temporal impact of COVID-19 on the field and its patients.

Indexed as

PandemicsRadiation OncologySocieties, MedicalCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19HumansMedical StaffPneumonia, ViralTelemedicineUnited States

Identifiers

PMID32890512
PMCPMC7462779
OpenAlexW3081917032

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.